Earlier this year, the Alabama Supreme Court ruled frozen embryos have the same rights as children. The decision sent shockwaves throughout Alabama and raised serious questions about the future of IVF in the United States. While the Alabama legislature has since passed legislation protecting IVF in the state, that doesn’t address the big question behind the court’s decision: What does personhood mean, and what does it mean for the anti-abortion movement?
Read More:
Fetal personhood laws, explained - Vox
Alabama’s Supreme Court IVF ruling is a warning to the country - Vox
Opinion | The Anti-Abortion Movement Is Gunning for Fetal Personhood - The New York Times
How America’s Two Abortion Realities Are Clashing - The New York Times
Submit your policy questions!
We want to know what you’re curious about.
Credits:
Jonquilyn Hill, host
Sofi LaLonde, producer
Cristian Ayala, engineer
A.M. Hall, editorial director of talk podcasts
Want to support The Weeds? Please consider making a donation to Vox: bit.ly/givepodcasts
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
What East Palestine can tell us about the rail industry
How a 1996 US immigration policy changed everything
Will the Supreme Court ruin the internet?
The Ukraine war: past, present, and future
$14 trillion and no mules
The Biden policy that could change your neighborhood
Insulin is for the world
Weeds Time Machine: The Voting Rights Act
Reintroducing The Weeds
The great American gerrymander
The scourge of the “time tax”
Climate optimism in 2023
Our mental health doom loop
The bipartisan bill that could protect elections
The rebirth of industrial policy
It’s time to regulate crypto
The Weeds’ weed episode
How to call an election
How to fix inflation
Why scaring voters works
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Tiny Desk Concerts - Video
60 Minutes
Left, Right & Center
The Axe Files with David Axelrod
Kickass News