In a high-stakes presidential election year, in partnership with the Newt and Jo Minow Debate Series at the Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, Open to Debate is taking a look at more than a decade of the Citizens United Supreme Court case. The 2010 landmark decision that ruled the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political communications by corporations, including nonprofits, labor unions, and other associations, changed the landscape of political spending in the U.S. This gave rise to Super PACS and an increase in election campaign spending. Since then, there have been questions about whether the decision has harmed our democratic process. Those who support the decision argue it upholds free speech, allowing diverse voices in the political arena, and broadens the range of discourse by enabling groups to freely express their views and support candidates or policies. Those against it argue that it allows a disproportionate influence from corporations and special interest groups, and leaves the voices of ordinary citizens overshadowed by the financial resources of a few, eroding the principles of equality and fair representation.
With this context, we debate the question: Has Citizens United Undermined Democracy?
This debate is presented in partnership with the Northwestern Pritzker School of Law as part of the Newt and Jo Minow Debate Series. It will be recorded live in person on Wednesday, February 21, 2024, at the Thorne Auditorium at Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law in Chicago, Illinois.
Arguing Yes: Francesca Procaccini, Assistant Professor of Law at Vanderbilt University Law School; Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, Professor of Law at Stetson University
Arguing No: Floyd Abrams, Senior Counsel at Cahill Gordon & Reindel; Eric Wang, Partner at The Gober Group, pro bono Senior Fellow at the Institute for Free Speech
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
#125 - Is "Big Pharma" to Blame for Rising Health Care Costs?
#124 - Are the Elites to Blame for the Trump Phenomenon?
#123 - Climate Change: Has the EPA Gone Overboard?
Bonus Podcast: The GOP Must Seize The Center Or Die
Bonus Podcast: The Supreme Court Considers Racial Preferences In State University Admissions
#122 - Has The President Usurped The Constitutional Power Of Congress?
#121 - Do Hunters Conserve Wildlife?
#120 - Eliminate Corporate Subsidies
#119 - Should We Trust The Promise Of Artificial Intelligence?
#118 - Is Free Speech Threatened On Campus?
#117 - Are Lifespans Long Enough?
#116 - Should The U.S. Let In 100,000 Syrian Refugees?
#115 - Does The Equal Protection Clause Forbid Racial Preferences In State University Admissions?
#114 - Can Central Banks Print Prosperity?
#113 - Do U.S. Prosecutors Have Too Much Power?
#112 - Should College Students Be Allowed To Take Smart Drugs?
#111 - Should We Raise The Federal Gas Tax To Fund Infrastructure?
Bonus Podcast: Is Death Final?
#110 - Are China And The U.S. Long-Term Enemies?
#109 - Should Courts Or Campuses Decide Sexual Assault Cases?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Navigating Life After 40
Teaching Learning Leading K-12
Regenerative Skills
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast