In a high-stakes presidential election year, in partnership with the Newt and Jo Minow Debate Series at the Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, Open to Debate is taking a look at more than a decade of the Citizens United Supreme Court case. The 2010 landmark decision that ruled the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political communications by corporations, including nonprofits, labor unions, and other associations, changed the landscape of political spending in the U.S. This gave rise to Super PACS and an increase in election campaign spending. Since then, there have been questions about whether the decision has harmed our democratic process. Those who support the decision argue it upholds free speech, allowing diverse voices in the political arena, and broadens the range of discourse by enabling groups to freely express their views and support candidates or policies. Those against it argue that it allows a disproportionate influence from corporations and special interest groups, and leaves the voices of ordinary citizens overshadowed by the financial resources of a few, eroding the principles of equality and fair representation.
With this context, we debate the question: Has Citizens United Undermined Democracy?
This debate is presented in partnership with the Northwestern Pritzker School of Law as part of the Newt and Jo Minow Debate Series. It will be recorded live in person on Wednesday, February 21, 2024, at the Thorne Auditorium at Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law in Chicago, Illinois.
Arguing Yes: Francesca Procaccini, Assistant Professor of Law at Vanderbilt University Law School; Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, Professor of Law at Stetson University
Arguing No: Floyd Abrams, Senior Counsel at Cahill Gordon & Reindel; Eric Wang, Partner at The Gober Group, pro bono Senior Fellow at the Institute for Free Speech
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Is the FDA Too Cautious?
Should Prosecutors Pursue Minor Crimes?
Will Millennials Be Left Behind?
Should the Government Raise the Retirement Age?
Should SCOTUS Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Should Congress Abolish the Debt Ceiling?
Is Netanyahu's Government Heading in the Wrong Direction?
Should Certain Books Be Banned in School?
What Does It Mean to "Win" An Argument? Mehdi Hasan in Conversation with John Donvan
Is Carbon Capture Essential to Fighting Climate Change?
Is Florida Eating New York's Lunch?
Is the Banking System Safer Than It Was in 2008?
Are Men Finished and Should We Help Them?
Is The Democratic Party Too Far Left?
Is America Too Obsessed With Race?
Should the FTC Ban Non-compete Clauses?
John Donvan In Conversation with David McRaney on the Science of Changing Minds
Should the U.S. Ban TikTok?
Will ChatGPT Do More Harm Than Good?
Has China's Power Peaked?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Meaningful Life with Andrew G. Marshall
The No-Frills Teacher Podcast
Heal, Survive & Thrive!
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast