The Supreme Court has never heard a Section 230 case—until now. Earlier this month, the justices agreed to review Gonzalez v. Google, in which the plaintiffs argue that YouTube’s “targeted recommendation” of videos falls outside Section 230 immunity. How did we get Section 230? Why is it important? What would the Internet look like without it? Emma Llansó, director of the Free Expression Project at the Center for Democracy & Technology, joins the show to explain how Section 230 came to be, how it has been implemented over the last quarter century, why Congress’s one amendment of it (via FOSTA) was a disaster, and why the upcoming Supreme Court case is so crucial.
#224: Disruptive Innovation (Part 1)
#223: Law Enforcement as a Political Weapon
#222: Bring in the Nerds: Reviving the Office of Technology Assessment
#221: Swarm’s Rogue Satellites
#220: FDA, Free Speech and E-Cigarettes
#219: Women in Tech
#218: How Should Congress Address Online Sex Trafficking?
#217: What is Cybersecurity, and How Can it Affect the Winter Olympics?
#216: The Nunes Memo and FISA Explained
#215: The Net Neutrality CRA: Yay or Nay?
#214: Information Intermediaries in a Nutshell
#213: Heat Baby Heat? Harm Reduction and E-Cigarettes
#212: Department of Labor Saves Gig Economy
#211: Warrantless Spying & Parallel Construction
#210: Watching the Watchmen: Surveillance in 2017 ... and Beyond
#209: Restoring Internet Freedom? Feat. Brendan Carr, FCC Commissioner
#208: Data Danger: Keeping Information Safe Online
#207: Carving Out Privacy Rights: Carpenter v US
#206: The Future of Internet Regulation w/ FCC Chairman Ajit Pai
#205: Who Owns the Airwaves?
Join Podbean Ads Marketplace and connect with engaged listeners.
Advertise Today
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Insight Story: Tech Trends Unpacked
Zero-Shot
Fast Forward by Tomorrow Unlocked: Tech past, tech future
The Unbelivable Truth - Series 1 - 26 including specials and pilot
Lex Fridman Podcast