To stop climate change, scientists indicate we need to get to net zero carbon dioxide emissions in less than ten years. Despite their amazing strides, renewable energy sources are not the panacea that their supporters are claiming. Due to their low density, significant mining and waste is generated to build up any significant generating capacity. Because of their intermittent nature, they usually require backup generating capacity to level the load, and this is often supplied by coal or gas. Nuclear energy, on the other hand, is a high density zero carbon energy source with over 90% availability that is widely reviled in society. On what basis have you formed your opinions of the risks surrounding nuclear energy? Would you be open to changing your mind on Nuclear if presented with evidence of safety?
Support The Rational View at patron.podbean.com/TheRationalView
Visit my website at TheRationalView.ca
Join the Facebook discussion @TheRationalView
Twitter @AlScottRational
#therationalview #science #climatechange #fossilfuels #nuclear #nuclearpower #newpodcast #cleanenergy #renewables
Artificial Intelligence: A Powerful Tool
The ethics of AI with Shalaleh Rismani
Thomas Frey on the future of AI
Artificial Intelligence and an Interview with a Bot!
Al and Al on AI
Artificial Intelligence: The Promise and the Risk
Gun Control (Episode 4)
Handguns with Jamie Melnick
Gun Control with Jay Nathwani
Gun Control
From Darkness to Zion Lights
Men advancing equality
Nuclear vs. Renewables
Can we afford [not] to have Universal Basic Income?
The Divide of Fear
The Big Bang: Just another origin story?
Nuclear power: Is it rational to worry (2 of 2)?
Nuclear power: Is it rational to worry (1 of 2)?
What's an Eco-Modernist?
Homeopathy and the Placebo Effect
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Modern West
Just Dumb Enough Podcast
Freakonomics Radio
The Why Files: Operation Podcast
Criminal
Jimmy Akin’s Mysterious World