As the Dobbs/Supreme Court leak, and its would-be draft opinion, percolate through the public and the media, certain alarms are sounded again and again. Are these worries realistic? What does the opinion say; what are the constitutional arguments and questions; where are the justices on these questions? We look at some of the more prominent pundits saying the more meme-like (and frightening) things, and put them to the test.
Section Three Goes to Washington
Section Three Punditry: The Good, The Bad, and The Silly
The World Turns to Section Three
Juries, Jarkesy, and a Joke
2 Experts, 3 Courts, Section 3, Part 3 - Special Guests William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen
Sandra the First
Sense and Nonsensibility on Section 3 - Special Guests Mark Graber and Gerard Magliocca
Guns, Clips, and Rahimi
Moore on the Brief - Special Guest Vikram David Amar
Moore, in Brief
Aisles, not Walls
Speakerless
A Tale of Two Jordans
Allen and Affirmative Action, Again
Eleven Presidents - Special Guest Bob Woodward
Have Kavanaugh, Will Travel
Justice Jackson’s Santa Clause
An Officer and a President
The Two Experts, Part Two - Special Guests William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen
The Two Experts on Section Three - Special Guests William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free