The nation awaits the Supreme Court’s seemingly inevitable review of the Section Three case from Colorado, and perhaps Maine as well. Media around the world is weighing in with editorials and op-Ed’s; a smorgasbord of legal, political, and predictive arguments from professors, editors, elected officials, and others with their own range of expertise. We continue our attempt to help you make sense of these by choosing pieces that make the range of arguments out there. We do our best to present their argument and respond to it, bringing Professor Amar’s considerable armamentarium to bear for your benefit. And this week, Akhil has at least two - maybe three - major new ideas he brings to the national discussion. They can be found here first. CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com.
Judges and Adverse Events
Doubting Thomas, and doubting the doubters
Discretion and Indictment
Much to Bragg About?
It’s Coming
The Lord Mayor Adams
Sing a Song (of) Mike Pence
Torture, Time Travel, and Transformation
Secrets, Boards, and Moots - Oh My!
Treason, Reason, History, and OurStory - Special Guest Kermit Roosevelt III
Trillion Dollar Tricks - Special Guest Jack Balkin
Declaration, or Gettysburg? - Special Guest Kermit Roosevelt III
Wait - Don’t Tell Me!
The Idaho Murder Case in Constitutional Perspective
Speaker-ish
January 6th, Santos, and The Speaker
Strictly Scrutinizing Moore - Special Guest Kate Shaw
More on Moore - The Oral Argument, Continued
Mr. Amar Goes to Washington - the Moore v. Harper Oral Argument
Out-Ranked: Live Podcast with Yale Law School’s FedSoc Chapter
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free