Pigs are human?

Pigs

 

Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v6rkwsp-pigs.html

 

Why do humans absolutely worship bacon? It’s rare to find someone who hates it. I’ve never been that fond of it, personally. And after this report, I now know why.

 

The pig genome shares remarkable similarities with the human genome, making pigs an important model for biomedical research. Scientists have found that the genetic makeup of pigs is close to humans in terms of sequence, structure, and function. This resemblance extends to genes responsible for immunity, metabolism, and organ function, which is why pigs are often used in studies related to human diseases and even organ transplantation.

 

One of the reasons for this genetic similarity is evolutionary conservation. Over millions of years, certain genes have remained unchanged between pigs and humans due to their essential roles in biological processes. Pigs and humans also have comparable sizes and physiology, making them particularly useful for medical experiments. Their cardiovascular systems, for instance, resemble those of humans, which is why pigs are commonly used in heart disease research.

 

Another fascinating aspect of the pig genome is its potential in xenotransplantation—the transplantation of organs between species. Because of their genetic similarity, pig organs can be modified to reduce the risk of rejection when transplanted into humans. Scientists have been working on genetic engineering techniques to remove harmful pig genes and introduce human-compatible ones, making pig organs more viable for human patients in need of transplants.

 

Pigs are also useful in studying genetic diseases. Many human conditions, such as cystic fibrosis and diabetes, have genetic counterparts in pigs. By studying how these diseases affect pigs, researchers can develop better treatments and therapies for humans. Pigs’ short reproductive cycles and large litters also make them ideal for genetic experiments, allowing scientists to observe hereditary patterns over multiple generations in a relatively short time.

 

Beyond medicine, the pig genome has agricultural implications. Understanding pig genetics helps improve breeding practices, disease resistance, and overall health in livestock. By identifying genes related to growth, meat quality, and resilience to illnesses, scientists can create healthier and more productive pig populations. This benefits not only the farming industry but also food security and sustainability efforts.

 

The sequencing of the pig genome has opened up new possibilities in multiple fields, from medicine to agriculture. Its similarities to the human genome continue to make pigs valuable in scientific research, offering insights into genetics, disease mechanisms, and even future advancements in organ transplantation.

 

Some scientists have proposed the controversial idea that pigs should be reclassified as a type of primate due to their genetic and physiological similarities to humans. While pigs are traditionally classified as part of the Suidae family within the order Artiodactyla (even-toed ungulates), some researchers argue that their genetic makeup, cognitive abilities, and biological functions are strikingly close to those of primates, warranting a reconsideration of their taxonomic classification.

 

One of the main reasons behind this idea is the genetic resemblance between pigs and primates, including humans. Studies have shown that certain genes and protein structures in pigs are more similar to those found in primates than in other mammals. Pigs also exhibit advanced cognitive functions, including problem-solving skills, social complexity, and even the ability to use tools in some cases. These traits are more commonly associated with primates, further fueling the debate on whether pigs should be considered closer to them in evolutionary terms.

 

Beyond genetics and intelligence, physiological similarities between pigs and primates strengthen this argument. Pig organs, particularly the heart, kidneys, and skin, closely resemble human counterparts in size, function, and immune response. This is why pigs are frequently used in medical research and xenotransplantation studies. Some scientists speculate that the evolutionary lineage of pigs may have involved unexpected genetic exchanges or convergent evolution, leading them to develop traits more in line with primates than with their hoofed relatives.

 

Despite these arguments, the idea of reclassifying pigs as primates remains highly controversial. Traditional taxonomy is based not only on genetic similarity but also on evolutionary history, skeletal structures, and reproductive biology. Pigs lack key primate traits, such as grasping hands, forward-facing eyes, and complex social hierarchies that define true primates. Most evolutionary biologists argue that while pigs may share some similarities with primates, they do not belong in the same category from a strict taxonomic standpoint.

 

Ultimately, while the discussion is intriguing, it is unlikely that pigs will be officially reclassified as primates anytime soon. However, the growing evidence of their intelligence and biological closeness to humans continues to challenge traditional perspectives on animal classification. This debate also raises ethical questions about how pigs are treated, given their cognitive and physiological similarities to species we consider more sentient. Whether or not pigs are ever reclassified, their unique traits make them one of the most fascinating animals in the scientific world.

 

Pigs and humans share many biological similarities beyond genetics, particularly in physical characteristics such as hairlessness, subcutaneous fat distribution, and overall body composition. These traits make pigs unique among non-primate mammals and have fueled scientific interest in their use for medical research, evolutionary studies, and even discussions about human origins.

 

One of the most striking similarities between pigs and humans is the relative lack of body hair. Unlike most mammals, which are covered in thick fur or bristles, both pigs and humans have sparse body hair, with most of their skin exposed. This hairlessness is thought to be an evolutionary adaptation that aids in thermoregulation. In humans, it allows for more efficient sweating, while in pigs, it may help with heat dissipation, particularly in domestic breeds that have been selectively bred for minimal hair. Some researchers have even speculated that the similar reduction in body hair could be due to convergent evolution, where different species develop comparable traits in response to similar environmental pressures.

 

Another key similarity is the presence of a thick layer of subcutaneous fat beneath the skin. In most mammals, fat is stored internally around organs, but in both pigs and humans, a significant portion of fat is distributed just beneath the skin. This subcutaneous fat serves multiple purposes, including insulation, energy storage, and protection against physical trauma. The way fat is stored and distributed in pigs is particularly similar to humans, which is why pig fat has historically been used in products like soap and even human medical treatments. This similarity also makes pigs valuable for studying obesity, metabolic diseases, and fat-related disorders in humans.

Fat distribution in pigs and humans follows similar patterns as well. Unlike other mammals that store fat primarily around their midsections, pigs and humans tend to accumulate fat in areas such as the abdomen, thighs, and buttocks. In both species, fat deposition is influenced by factors like diet, hormones, and genetics. This shared trait has made pigs useful in research on human obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases, as scientists can study how fat is metabolized and how different dietary and genetic factors influence fat accumulation.

 

Beyond fat and hair, pigs and humans also share other skin-related similarities. Pig skin is remarkably close to human skin in terms of thickness, structure, and collagen composition. This is why pig skin is often used in medical research, particularly for burn treatment studies and skin grafts. Some cosmetic companies even use pig skin to test skincare products because of its similarity to human skin in terms of absorption and reaction to chemicals.

 

The biological similarities between pigs and humans continue to raise interesting scientific and ethical questions. These resemblances make pigs an invaluable model for medical research, but they also challenge traditional views of animal classification and consciousness. Whether these traits arose due to shared evolutionary ancestry or similar environmental pressures, the close resemblance between pigs and humans remains a fascinating area of study.

 

Pigs are among the most intelligent and social animals, displaying cognitive abilities and emotional complexity comparable to those of dogs, primates, and even young children. Their intelligence is evident in problem-solving skills, memory retention, and the ability to learn complex tasks. Scientists have conducted numerous studies demonstrating pigs' ability to navigate mazes, recognize symbols, and even play simple video games using their snouts. These findings challenge traditional perceptions of pigs as mere livestock and highlight their advanced cognitive capabilities.

 

One of the most remarkable aspects of pig intelligence is their memory. Pigs can remember locations of food sources, recognize individuals (both human and pig), and recall learned behaviors long after training sessions. Studies have shown that pigs can anticipate future events based on past experiences, a trait associated with higher-order thinking. For example, if a pig learns that a specific action leads to a reward, it can apply that knowledge in new contexts, demonstrating adaptability and learning beyond simple conditioning.

 

Pigs are also highly social animals, forming complex relationships with both their peers and humans. In the wild, pigs live in matriarchal groups led by older females, where they establish social hierarchies and maintain strong bonds. They communicate using a wide range of vocalizations, body language, and even facial expressions. Researchers have identified over 20 distinct pig vocalizations used to express emotions such as excitement, distress, contentment, and warning signals. This sophisticated communication system enables pigs to coordinate group movements, care for their young, and warn each other of potential threats.

 

Their social nature extends to empathy and cooperation. Pigs have been observed comforting distressed companions, indicating emotional intelligence and an understanding of others' feelings. In laboratory settings, pigs have shown a willingness to help other pigs obtain food, even when they receive no direct benefit. Such behaviors suggest a level of altruism and social awareness that is rare among non-primate animals.

 

Pigs also display playfulness, a trait often associated with higher intelligence. They engage in playful behaviors such as running, mock fighting, and even playing with objects in their environment. Young pigs have been seen play-chasing each other and tossing toys, similar to how dogs or children play. Play behavior is a strong indicator of cognitive development, as it involves problem-solving, social interaction, and learning through experience.

 

Because of their intelligence and sociability, pigs have been increasingly recognized as companion animals in some cultures. Many pet pig owners report that their pigs can learn commands, respond to their names, and even exhibit distinct personalities. However, their intelligence and need for social interaction also mean they require mental stimulation and companionship to thrive. Without it, pigs can become bored, frustrated, or even depressed.

 

The intelligence and social complexity of pigs continue to challenge the way humans view them. While they have historically been seen as farm animals raised primarily for food, scientific research has revealed that pigs possess remarkable cognitive and emotional depth. Their ability to think, feel, and interact in sophisticated ways suggests that they deserve greater consideration and ethical treatment in both agricultural and domestic settings.

 

Pigs are among the oldest domesticated animals, with their relationship to humans dating back over 9,000 years. Archaeological evidence suggests that pig domestication began in multiple regions, primarily in the Near East and China, where early human societies started taming wild boars for food, trade, and companionship. Unlike some other domesticated animals, pigs adapted quickly to human settlements, thriving on food scraps and waste, which made them an ideal livestock choice for ancient agricultural societies.

 

The domestication of pigs is believed to have occurred independently in different parts of the world. Genetic studies show that early humans selectively bred wild boars to create domesticated pig populations suited for human needs. In the Near East, pigs were among the first animals raised in organized farming communities, alongside sheep, goats, and cattle. Meanwhile, in China, pigs became central to agriculture and cuisine, playing an essential role in food production for thousands of years. Over time, domesticated pigs spread across Europe and Asia through trade routes and human migration, leading to the development of various pig breeds adapted to different climates and environments.

 

One of the key reasons for the early domestication of pigs was their ability to survive in diverse environments and their omnivorous diet. Unlike ruminant livestock such as cattle or sheep, pigs can eat a wide range of foods, including grains, fruits, vegetables, and even meat. This made them highly valuable in agricultural societies where food resources varied by season. Additionally, pigs reproduce quickly, with large litters, making them an efficient and renewable food source for growing human populations.

 

As human civilizations advanced, pigs played a crucial role in cultural and economic life. In ancient Rome, pigs were a staple food source, and their meat was considered essential for feeding large populations. Roman farmers developed breeding techniques to improve the quality of pork, and pigs were commonly used in religious sacrifices and feasts. In China, pigs became symbols of prosperity and wealth, often depicted in art and mythology as signs of abundance. The pig's importance was so significant that it remains a key figure in the Chinese zodiac to this day.

 

During the Age of Exploration, European explorers and settlers brought domesticated pigs to the Americas, Africa, and other parts of the world. Spanish explorers such as Hernando de Soto and Christopher Columbus introduced pigs to the Caribbean and North America in the 15th and 16th centuries, where they quickly adapted to new environments. In some cases, pigs escaped from settlements and formed wild populations, leading to the spread of feral pig species that still exist today in parts of North America and Australia.

 

Despite thousands of years of domestication, pigs have retained many traits of their wild ancestors. Unlike other domesticated animals that have been extensively modified, pigs remain intelligent, adaptable, and capable of surviving in the wild if released. Their long history with humans has not only shaped agriculture and food culture but has also influenced art, mythology, and even language, with phrases like "bringing home the bacon" and "piggy bank" reflecting their deep cultural significance.

 

Today, pigs continue to be one of the most widely raised livestock animals in the world, providing meat, leather, and even biomedical products used in medicine. Their long history of domestication highlights their resilience, adaptability, and enduring importance in human civilization. Whether in ancient settlements or modern farms, pigs have remained a vital part of human society for millennia.

 

The theory that humans might have evolved from an ancient crossbreeding event between chimpanzees and wild boars is an unconventional and highly controversial idea proposed by geneticist Eugene McCarthy. Unlike the mainstream scientific consensus, which holds that humans share a common ancestor with chimpanzees through natural evolutionary divergence, McCarthy suggested that hybridization between two distinct species—primates and pigs—could explain certain unusual traits found in humans.

McCarthy’s hypothesis is based on the observation that while humans share a high percentage of their DNA with chimpanzees, they also possess several physiological and anatomical features that are more similar to pigs than to other primates. He pointed to characteristics such as relatively hairless skin, subcutaneous fat distribution, certain aspects of the human immune system, and even organ compatibility as potential evidence that human ancestors may have had genetic input from pigs at some point in evolutionary history. According to his theory, an ancient hybridization event between a chimpanzee-like ancestor and a wild boar could have resulted in offspring that carried genetic material from both species. Over generations, these hybrids might have undergone further evolution and genetic refinement, eventually giving rise to modern humans.

 

One of the key challenges to McCarthy’s theory is the biological barrier that exists between species as distantly related as primates and pigs. In conventional evolutionary biology, successful crossbreeding typically occurs only between species that are closely related, such as different breeds of dogs or different species of big cats. The genetic distance between pigs and primates is vast, making the likelihood of viable hybrid offspring extremely low. Additionally, while hybridization has played a role in the evolution of certain species—such as in plants, fish, and some mammals—there is no direct evidence to suggest that such an extreme cross-species event could result in a lineage as distinct as humans.

 

Despite these scientific obstacles, McCarthy's hypothesis remains an interesting, if speculative, discussion in evolutionary biology. Some researchers acknowledge that hybridization has been an underexplored mechanism in human evolution, even if the pig-chimpanzee theory itself lacks empirical support. The idea challenges traditional views of human origins and raises broader questions about the role of interspecies genetic exchange in evolution.

 

Mainstream evolutionary science overwhelmingly supports the standard model that humans and chimpanzees diverged from a common ancestor millions of years ago through natural selection and adaptation. The genetic similarities between pigs and humans can largely be explained by convergent evolution, where different species independently develop similar traits due to similar environmental pressures rather than direct hybridization. While McCarthy’s theory is considered highly speculative and lacks scientific validation, it has nevertheless sparked curiosity and debate about the complexities of evolution and the unexpected genetic similarities found in nature.

 

Now, everything I have told you is what mainstream science and academia is reporting and have concluded. The interesting thing about science is they can only tell you how things behave but never what they are or where they are from. Are there any clues out there that explains why the pig is closer to man than apes? And why has the pig been sidestepped when genetically it matches us more than apes? Why are we not using ape parts for transplants and skin infusions? The answer is hilarious. Ethical and conservation concerns, size, reproduction (litters - my favorite excuse) and diseases. Evolutionists say even though humans are genetically closer to apes, practical considerations—including ethical concerns, organ compatibility, disease risks, and availability—make pigs the best choice for medical procedures such as organ transplants and skin grafts. Genetic similarity alone does not determine medical suitability, and pigs offer a safer, more sustainable, and ethically acceptable alternative to using primates in transplantation and regenerative medicine.

 

In a groundbreaking scientific experiment, researchers injected human stem cells into pig fetuses and discovered something unexpected—some cells in the resulting pig embryos contained a mix of human and pig DNA at a level far deeper than previously thought possible. This experiment, part of ongoing research into xenotransplantation and human-animal chimeras, was initially intended to explore the potential for growing human-compatible organs in pigs. However, the findings raised new and surprising questions about the nature of cellular integration and genetic mixing between species.

Typically, when human stem cells are introduced into an animal embryo, they are expected to remain genetically distinct from the host’s cells. In most cases, these human-derived cells function alongside the animal’s cells without merging their genetic material. However, in this experiment, researchers discovered that some pig cells exhibited a fusion of human and pig DNA at the most intimate level, meaning that the genetic material from both species combined within single cells rather than remaining separate. This is an entirely unexpected outcome because, under normal circumstances, species barriers prevent such deep genetic integration.

 

The presence of hybrid human-pig cells challenges our current understanding of how stem cells interact with foreign embryonic environments. It suggests that, under the right conditions, the biological machinery of one species may accept and even merge with the genetic material of another species in ways previously thought impossible. While the exact mechanisms behind this fusion remain unclear, scientists speculate that the highly adaptable nature of stem cells may allow them to integrate more deeply than anticipated, especially during early embryonic development when cells are still highly plastic and capable of dramatic changes.

 

These findings have major implications for both medical science and bioethics. From a medical standpoint, this research brings us a step closer to growing human-compatible organs in pigs, which could revolutionize transplantation medicine and address the severe shortage of donor organs. However, the discovery that human and pig DNA can mix at such a fundamental level raises complex ethical and philosophical concerns. If human genetic material can integrate so seamlessly with that of another species, where do we draw the line between what is considered human and what is not? Could such research unintentionally create animals with partially human-like traits beyond just organ compatibility?

 

Despite these concerns, scientists emphasize that the research is still in its early stages, and there is no evidence that these human-pig chimeras exhibit human-like consciousness or characteristics. The primary goal remains to develop new ways to grow replacement organs that are genetically compatible with human patients, potentially eliminating the need for immunosuppressive drugs and reducing transplant rejection rates. However, the unexpected genetic blending observed in this experiment underscores the need for careful regulation and ethical consideration as this field of research progresses.

 

As science continues to push the boundaries of what is possible, discoveries like these challenge our traditional definitions of species and raise profound questions about the future of biotechnology. While the fusion of human and pig DNA was not the intended goal of this experiment, it highlights the extraordinary complexity of genetic interactions and opens new avenues for exploring the possibilities—and limits—of human-animal hybrid research.

 

"The adult pigs that had received human stem cells as fetuses were found to have pig cells, human cells and the hybrid cells in their blood and organs.

 

"What we found was completely unexpected. We found that the human and pig cells had totally fused in the animals' bodies,' said Jeffrey Platt, director of the Mayo Clinic Transplantation Biology Program.

"The hybrid cells had both human and pig surface markers. But, most surprisingly, the hybrid cell nuclei were found to have chromosomal DNA that contained both human and pig genes. The researchers found that about 60 per cent of the animals' non-pig cells were hybrids, with the remainder being fully human."

 

The term “long pig” is a phrase historically associated with certain cultures that practiced cannibalism, particularly in the Pacific Islands. It refers to human flesh, likening it to pork due to its perceived similarities in taste and texture. The term gained attention through the accounts of early European explorers and missionaries who encountered indigenous tribes where cannibalistic rituals were practiced.

 

The origins of the phrase “long pig” come from languages in regions such as Polynesia, Melanesia, and parts of Southeast Asia. In these cultures, pigs were a primary source of meat, and since human flesh was said to resemble pork in both flavor and texture, the term was used as a descriptive comparison. The word “long” was likely added to differentiate human meat from traditional pig meat, emphasizing the elongated shape of the human body compared to the stout form of a pig.

 

Anthropologists and historians have documented cases of ritualistic cannibalism in various indigenous societies. In some cultures, consuming human flesh was part of warfare, where enemies were eaten as an ultimate act of dominance. In other cases, it was a funerary practice, where consuming the dead was seen as a way to honor and keep the spirit of the deceased within the community. However, cannibalism was often surrounded by spiritual and ceremonial beliefs rather than being a regular dietary practice.

 

One of the most well-documented references to “long pig” comes from Fiji, which was notorious for cannibalistic traditions before European contact led to cultural shifts. Missionary accounts describe how captured enemies were sometimes referred to as “long pig” before being prepared for ritual consumption. Similar references have been found in accounts from other regions, such as Papua New Guinea and parts of the Solomon Islands, where cannibalistic practices were occasionally observed.

 

While the practice of cannibalism has largely disappeared due to cultural changes, modernization, and legal prohibitions, the phrase “long pig” has persisted as a dark and fascinating piece of linguistic history. It has also been used in literature and pop culture, often appearing in horror stories, anthropology texts, and even fictional narratives exploring themes of survival and taboo. The enduring curiosity about this term reflects a broader human fascination with the extreme and forbidden aspects of history.

 

The Jewish Connection

 

The Torah, or Old Testament forbids the consumption of pig. The Torah, which forms the foundational text of Jewish law and tradition, prohibits the consumption of pigs, or "swine," in the dietary laws known as kashrut. The specific prohibition against eating pork is outlined in the Book of Leviticus(11:7) and the Book of Deuteronomy (14:8), where it states that pigs are considered "unclean" animals and not fit for consumption. The reasoning behind this prohibition is multifaceted, including religious, cultural, and symbolic elements.

 

The primary reason given in the Torah for not eating pork is the concept of ritual purity. In Leviticus, animals that are permissible for consumption must meet two specific criteria: they must have split hooves and must chew cud (i.e., they must be ruminants). Pigs have split hooves but do not chew cud, which makes them ritually impure according to these laws. This classification of animals is part of a broader system of dietary laws intended to distinguish the Jewish people from other nations and to maintain a sense of holiness and separation from the practices of surrounding cultures.

 

The Torah’s dietary laws, which include prohibitions against eating certain animals, not only served to maintain the physical health and well-being of the Israelites but also functioned as a way to foster a sense of spiritual discipline. By adhering to these rules, the Israelites were reminded of their unique covenant with God and their commitment to living according to divine commandments. The laws surrounding clean and unclean animals were symbolic of the broader theme of distinguishing between the sacred and the profane, the holy and the unholy. Consuming certain animals, like pigs, was seen as a way of engaging with the world in a manner that was incompatible with the values of purity and holiness that the Torah sought to instill.

 

Historically, some scholars believe that the prohibition against eating pigs may also have served practical purposes in the ancient world. Pigs are omnivores and can be carriers of diseases such as trichinosis, which could have made them unsafe to eat, particularly in times when proper methods of cooking and preserving food were not widely known. Additionally, in the arid climates of the ancient Near East, pigs were not ideal for farming and were often associated with the more nomadic and less sanitary practices of surrounding cultures, especially those that did not follow strict dietary laws. The Torah's restriction may have thus been a way of encouraging health-conscious practices within the community.

 

From a symbolic perspective, the prohibition against eating pork has often been interpreted as a way of emphasizing distinctiveness between the Jewish people and the neighboring nations. Many ancient cultures around Israel, such as the Egyptians and the Philistines, consumed pork, and the act of abstaining from it helped the Israelites maintain a unique cultural and religious identity. This idea of separation is a recurring theme in the Torah, where Israelites are often instructed to avoid the customs and practices of other peoples, as part of their mission to uphold the laws and commandments of God.

 

Throughout Jewish history, the dietary laws of kashrut have remained an integral part of religious practice and identity. While the reasons behind the prohibition against eating pigs may have evolved and been interpreted in various ways over time, the Torah’s teachings on this matter continue to hold significant spiritual, cultural, and historical importance for Jewish communities worldwide.

 

Reptilians

 

An interesting book by Stewart Swerdlow called Blue Blood, True Blood: Conflict and Creation, he talks about how the Bluebloods, who are reptiles quickly realized that with 50/50 split in the bloodline, it was necessary to shapeshift. When the split increased too far to the Reptilian side, shapeshifting and holding human form became impossible. In these cases, it was discovered that the ingestion of human hormones, flesh, and blood, allowed the Reptilians to maintain the human form.

 

Stewart Swerdlow is a multifaceted individual with claims of involvement in highly unusual events and a strong belief in hidden influences shaping human history and consciousness. He is primarily known as an author who has written several books, including "The White Owl Legends: An Archetypal Story of Creation" and "The Healer's Handbook: A Journey Into Hyperspace". A central aspect of Swerdlow's narrative is his claim of being a survivor of the Montauk Project, a purported secret government program. He states that he underwent "indoctrinations" by controllers and handlers within this project and interacted with alien and interdimensional beings at various government facilities. These experiences serve as a primary source of the information he shares in his books and lectures. 

 

Stewart believes human form was necessary to maintain to avoid scaring the population, which was now not accustomed to the Reptilian form. Control of the masses was easier when the orders came from a humanoid. The Reptilian format was kept to religious icons and legends. The statues of their gods and goddesses reflect the Reptilian influence, even showing a female Reptilian holding a hybrid baby.

 

The shapeshifting Reptilian Bluebloods asked the Sirians for help with the daily maintenance of their human forms. The Sirians determined that feeding the hybrids human hormones and blood in an altered animal form would be the easiest way to do it unnoticed by the population.

 

The sacrificial animal used by most Middle Eastern people was the wild boar, so the Sirians chose it as the basis for this new animal hybrid. Human genetics were mixed with those of the wild boar to create the domesticated pig. This animal was served daily to the Bluebloods as a method of temporarily maintaining their human form until they could use an actual human in a sacrificial ceremony.

 

Because the domesticated pig is a combination of human and animal genetics, eating it is a form of cannibalism. This explains why the Hebrews considered it unclean to eat. This is also why the pig is considered to be the most intelligent animal on Earth, why pig skin can be grafted directly onto humans in burn cases, and why pig heart valves can be used in humans with little difficulty. Cancer drugs and other chemicals are often tested on pigs before humans.

 

The domesticated pig frequency, or group mind, is the perfect vehicle for animal species to enter before entering human form on their evolutionary progression. In many respects, pigs can be considered a form of humanity. To a lesser degree, the same is true about cats.

 

This hypothesis incorporates external alien civilizations and not dimensional. Our own government admits to intra-dimensional beings and not to outer space. This fits the narrative I believe in, where the fallen angels or sons of god are responsible for this mess and that the pigs were genetically modified by them and not some cosmic alien race. 

 

Nephilim

 

My belief is based on technology that we have built within the last 100 years. This faith comes from what is already being worked on between man and whatever ghosts they conjure up for wisdom and knowledge. To expect something else other than what we see right now, doesn’t make logical sense. I believe the exact same thing that happened before the flood is now happening. There are clues. First book of Enoch and Genesis 6. Dinosaurs etc.. Genetically modified madness. I have had a hard time believing in the sons of god whom are spiritual from another dimension actually have genetic makeups to have children.

 

What makes the most sense to me is they influenced man to help build the technology where they can genetically alter things. I believe Satan is responsible for the dinosaurs as they do not fit here. After the creation of the nephilim, they became giants whom had big mouths to feed. In order to satisfy their hunger, they had to create something they could eat. Dinosaurs came from birds. But that is another story. Pigs, I believe were genetically created from humans and boar for some specific reason. Why did Jesus cast Legion into a herd of pigs? Jesus allows a "legion" of demons to enter a herd of pigs, who then run into the sea and drown, after the demons begged to be sent into the pigs rather than be cast into the abyss. 

 

This is a huge clue as to what demons can crawl into. Can demons possess an animal other than pigs? Parasites? Birds? Maybe this clue says only pigs and humans. The word "swine" originates from the Old English word "swin," meaning "domestic pig, hog, sow; wild boar," ultimately stemming from the Proto-Germanic "*sweina-" and the Proto-Indo-European "*su-" meaning "pig". In Hebrew it is chazir. The Hebrew word "chazir" (חזיר), meaning "pig," is of uncertain etymology, though it's possible it has roots in Ugaritic or Aramaic, and it's also noted that the root CH-Z-R also means "to return," "repeat," or "review".

 

Again, what a clue! To return and repeat what the sons of god did before the flood. I believe the pig was taken onto Noah’s ark for man to find the clues of genetic modification from the sons of god in Genesis 6. But what would creating this human/boar hybrid achieve? Logically, they would need something to use for medical means. Something not controversial and close enough to the body to get away with it. Don’t think that they didn’t have morals back then, too. Society was just the same as it is now. What started out as controversy, later became accepted just like all things here and now. 

 

If scientists would dig further into the genome of pigs, I believe they will see signatures from the scientists back then. Especially in the DNA. Scientists have identified specific DNA methylation patterns, also known as "episignatures" or "DNA methylation signatures," that can serve as indicators of gene-altering events, particularly in the context of rare disorders and epigenetics. Although they say its from nature, some mainstream scientists admit this was done in a laboratory, but the identity of the creator remains a mystery.

 

Pigs taste good because they are close to our own pallet. We are what we eat. 

 

Sources

 

https://conspiracies.win/p/15IEAWaHWD/i-think-i-got-a-brand-new-conspi/

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn4558-pighuman-chimeras-contain-cell-surprise.html

http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum29/HTML/000150.html

https://aces.illinois.edu/news/human-pig-genome-comparison-complete

https://phys.org/news/2015-09-hidden-evolutionary-relationship-pigs-primates.html

https://www.treehugger.com/pigs-and-humans-more-closely-related-thought-according-genetic-analysis-4863855

https://sentientmedia.org/pig-intelligence/

https://phys.org/news/2013-07-chimp-pig-hybrid-humans.html

https://vocal.media/humans/exploring-ancient-biotechnologies-gene-altering-practices-of-early-civilizations