The conversation involving Dr. Condic, Dr. Giesting and Schmitt turned to the complexities of the nation’s debate about abortion. That debate engages a mix of biological facts (which may or may not be probed in the full context of updated knowledge), personal experiences, and deeply held principles, positions, and emotions including authentic sympathy for the circumstances in which pregnant women find themselves. Although providing scientific insights is a crucial advancement of the debate because people deserve to have comprehensive information, the laying out of certain biological facts alone will not necessarily change minds, Condic said.
In many cases, much of the public presentation of the abortion controversy dividing people is manufactured, but there is room for honest discussion on particular grounds. We each can play a part in adding to human understandings in this controversy. People evolve their judgments on the wide scope of the debate incrementally over time.
But the search for a full overview is complicated; indeed, Dr. Condic referred to difficulties she and her brother Samuel Condic encountered (different vocabularies, etc.) in compiling their book Human Embryos, Human Beings. The book aims to bring together philosophical and biological insights about human life at its beginning. In short, the abortion debate requires us to spend more time in listening to each other, asking questions, probing the basis of people’s stances, and less time in simply lecturing, she said.
Paul talked about his experience with identical twins in his family. Twinning is a complex arena for understanding “who you are,” raising core questions with biological and philosophical implications. Our discussion around the microphone extended to research on the topics of compaction and chimeras. Condic has written a book that delves into the complexities. Untangling Twinning is scheduled for publication this summer.
There are also biological phenomena complicating an understanding of our human nature in sexual terms. There can be complex factors differentiating between one’s genetic sex and one’s hormonal sex, Condic said. A very small segment of the population has genetically compound sexual identities. Intersex disorders can occur in a variety of ways, although in the vast majority of cases questions of a person’s gender identity are not grounded in physical causes, Condic said. Studies in some areas raise questions within the LGBTQ community itself. Among many, endeavors focusing on a “gay gene” that would undergird a statement that “I was born this way” have been diminished by a view that gender identity is fluid or is driven by non-genetic factors.
Episode 053 - Chris Baglow & Jay Martin: beyond faith & science... faith & everything
Bonus Episode - Patricia Bellm: Compartmentalization vs. integration
Episode 052 - Chris Baglow & Jay Martin: the mission to (re)integrate science & faith
Bonus Episode - Patricia Bellm: Bible interpretation
Episode 051 - Patricia Bellm: Responsibility and control in science and engineering
Bonus Episode - Patricia Bellm: Miguel from Mexico
Episode 050 - Craig Lent: decoherence, entropy, and faith
Episode 049 - Craig Lent: physics and humanity
Bonus Episode - Patricia Bellm: Marriage & canon law
Episode 048 - Terry Ehrman: God vs. Godzilla, carmen Dei vs. strepitus naturae
Episode 047 - Terry Ehrman: theology and ecology, respecting the grammar of natures
Episode 046 - Daniel Hinshaw and the frontier between medicine and faith
Episode 045 - Daniel Hinshaw and the human microcosmos
Episode 044 - The Brain and The Pain of Being Human
Episode 043 - Introduction to the Brain
Episode 042 - TSSM in 2019, part 2
Episode 041 - TSSM in 2019
Episode 040 - Kirby Runyon: Christian planetary scientist
Episode 039 - Star of Bethlehem
Episode 038 - Jill Pasteris: Uncertainty and Faith
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Plant People
Regenerative Agriculture Podcast
Kosmographia
The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens
Bedrock: Earth’s Earliest History