Ever wondered how to navigate the complex world of reading research as an educator? Get ready for a great conversation with education researcher Neena Saha, who reveals the role of science in education and the importance of pseudoscience in developing theories. We delve into the significance of meta-analyses and discuss the need for caution when using this method. Neena then shares some current reading research with us!
Resources
- SamePage Reading Facebook Group
- MetaMetrics’ Reading Research Recap
- Join the Reading Research mailing list
- The Reading League Journal
- The Reading League recording on what teachers need to know about “how science works” (skip to 1 hour, 40 min)
- Meta-Analysis Review
- Robert Slavin’s Blogs
- In Meta-Analyses, Weak Inclusion Standards Lead to Misleading Conclusions. Here’s Proof.
- How Can You Tell When The Findings of a Meta-Analysis Are Likely to Be Valid?
- Meta-Analysis and Its Discontents
- Criticisms of Meta-Analysis (but also great rebuttals)
- Morphology Recent Research Studies
- Executive Functions and Morphological Awareness Explain the Shared Variance between Word Reading and Listening Comprehension
- Effects of Target Age and Genre on Morphological Complexity in Children’s Reading Material
- Contrasting Direct Instruction in Morphological Decoding and Morphological Inquiry-Analysis Interventions in Grade 3 Children With Poor Morphological Awareness
- Fluency Recent Research Study
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Readers’ Theatre impact on the development of reading skills
- Comprehension Recent Research Study
We wrote a book! The Literacy 50-A Q&A Handbook for Teachers: Real-World Answers to Questions About Reading That Keep You Up at Night
- Facebook and join our Facebook Group
- Twitter
- Instagram
Don't miss an episode! Sign up for FREE bonus resources and episode alerts at LiteracyPodcast.com
Helping teachers learn about science of reading, knowledge building, and high quality curriculum.