Links:
Description:
When thinking about the effect of eating or not eating a certain food or nutrient, we can’t consider this in isolation. Meaning, we need to evaluate the impact within the context of what such an inclusion/exclusion does to an individual’s overall diet pattern.
Thinking about this concept, the phrase “compared to what?” has been colloquially used. And while this is an important idea, there has been some misapplication of this principle.
In nutrition science, this is related to the concept of food or nutrient “substitution”. And this concept is crucial to understanding the issues that can arise in nutrition studies, particularly when it comes to single food analyses in nutritional epidemiology.
This concept of substitution is quite intuitive in controlled feeding studies. However, it is not as obvious when considering nutrition epidemiology studies. As noted by Ibsen & Dahm (2022):
“Whereas studying the effects of eating one food instead of another is typically explicit in interventional study designs, it is often implicit and sometimes hidden in analyses of observational studies.”
However, in nutrition epidemiology substitution is still happening, but it typically emerges as a consequence of adjustment models. In nutritional epidemiology, it is essential to adjust for confounders. E.g., one vital adjustment is often for total calorie intake. However, when our exposure is a specific food/nutrient, we must think about confounding by other foods.
So knowing what, and how, a study is adjusting for variables helps us interpret it better.
In this episode, Dr. Alan Flanagan and Danny Lennon discuss these crucial ideas of food substitution, adjustment models, and “compared to what?”.
Go to this episode's page (with links)
#521: How Does Coffee Impact Our Health?
#520: How Exercise Impacts Appetite, Food Intake and Adiposity – James Dorling, PhD
SNP28: How To Eat for Longevity
#519: Eating Disorders: Inpatient Treatment & Challenges – Helen West, RD
#518: Nutritional Geometry, Philosophy of Science & A Case for Reductionism – Prof. David Raubenheimer & Jonathan Sholl, PhD
#517: Reflecting on Ten Years of Lessons
#516: How to Read Nutrition Studies (Become Confident in Critically Appraising Research)
AMA: Do Low-carbers Need Less Vitmain C? Does Omega-3 Supplementation Actually Benefit Us? & More (SNP 27)
#515: Does Dietary Fat Quality Causally Affect Atherosclerosis Risk? – Jacob Christensen, PhD
#514: Plant-derived Fatty Acids – Ella Baker, PhD
#513: Kidney Stones & Diet – Deepa Kariyawasam, RD
What are Dietary Reference Intakes? Origins, Development & Use (SNP 26)
#512: Alzheimer’s Disease – Drs. Ayesha & Dean Sherzai
#511: Null By Design – When “No Effect” Doesn’t Mean No Effect
#510: Social Comparison: Evidence on its Impacts & What We Can Do – Shannon Beer
AMA: Coconut Oil, Raw Oats, Collagen, & More! (SNP 25)
#509: Helping Clients & Patients Overcome Nutrition Confusion – Jono Steedman, APD
#508: Why Athletes Can Achieve High Performance During an Energy Deficit – Jose Areta, PhD
#507: Does a Higher Portfolio Diet Score Reduce Heart Disease? – Andrea Glenn, PhD
Listener Q&A: Homocysteine, MUFA, Healhty BMI, and more! (Preview)
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Practically Healthy by Dr. Melina
ZOE Science & Nutrition
Intermittent Fasting Stories
Biohacking Superhuman Performance
Nutrition Diva