We here at Iron Culture have been on a mission to better inform you, dear listener, as to the inner workings of science. From what goes on in the lab itself, to the publication process, to dissemination, to eventual meta-analysis, the challenge of interpretation and communication of science, the optimistic promises of open science, and the increasing focus on replication, it’s been a hopefully eye-opening and overall encouraging discussion. However, while the scientific method is inherently self-correcting, the apparatus of science is far from perfect and there is a big problem with its principle tool of correcting the peer-reviewed record: retraction. What leads to a paper being retracted? What is the process? How does it impact the literature? Most importantly, does it effectively change the understanding of the science in the community the studies are meant to serve? Join the Erics in this most recent episode as they break it all down!
00:00 Retraction in science and a recently retracted study on cold water immersion
Néma 2024 Impact of cold exposure on life satisfaction and physical composition of soldiershttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36599485/
Iron Culture Ep. 267- Addressing Data Fraud in Nutrition Science https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZqQ0_pweTs
16:00 A peak behind the sport science curtain
25:19 The process of retraction and its flaws
Soria-Gila 2015 Effects of Variable Resistance Training on Maximal Strength: A Meta-Analysishttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25968227/
Retraction Watch https://retractionwatch.com/
41:15 Keeping up to date with retractions and critically appraising studies
Wakefield 1998 Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9500320/
1:00:54 Wild claims from science communicators and their responsibility
1:11:09 Letter to the editor and the retraction process
Phillips 2017 Changes in body composition and performance with supplemental HMB-FA+ATPhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28301440/
1:22:53 The open science movement and the dangers of unreliable findings
1:30:04 Moving forward: the effective science communicatorand alternative publishing models
1:39:16 Closing out this intervention episode for Helms
Ep. 272 - Mike Tuchscherer: Peaking After 20 Years of Powerlifting
Ep. 271 - Powerlifting, Natural Bodybuilding & Science (Eric Trexler’s Journey)
Ep. 269 - Are Social Media PhDs Ruining Fitness? (feat Dr. Milo Wolf, Max Coleman & Dr. Pak)
Ep. 268 - Science Communication, Gatekeeping & The Fitness Industry (feat Dr. Pak)
Ep. 267 - Addressing Data Fraud in Nutrition Science
Ep. 266 - Are Plant-based Proteins Actually Superior?
Ep. 265 - Are Your Supplements Contaminated?
Ep. 264 - Why the “52 Set Study” Doesn’t Matter
Ep. 263 - Is Protein Timing Debunked?
Ep. 262 - Sheffield 2024 Recap
Ep. 261 - A Unified Theory of Metabolic Adaptation?
Ep. 260 - Does Powerlifting with a Rounded Back Cause Pain?
Ep. 259 - MASScast 6: Response Variation, Individualizing Training, and Protein Consistency (ft. Dr. Mike Zourdos and Dr. Eric Trexler
Ep. 258 - The Rise of Lifting Antiscience
Ep. 257 - WNBF Pro World & Pro Natural Olympia 2023 Champion Beccy Pateman
Ep. 256 - The Challenge of Science Communication (feat Layne Norton)
Ep. 255 - WNBF World, Yorton Cup & Ms. America 2023 Champion Natalie Hays
Ep. 254 - Do Fat Burners Actually Work?
Ep. 253 - 2023 Lightweight WNBF Pro World Champion Dirk Emmerich
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Relaxback UK Show
Your Sleep Guru Podcast
Good Nurse Bad Nurse
Nothing much happens: bedtime stories to help you sleep
این نقطه