Links:
About This Episode:
Peaks in blood glucose (or “blood sugar spikes”) are commonly highlighted as something harmful to health. And, of course, an excessively high blood glucose response to a meal can be problematic, or at least indicate there is a problem.
However, elevations in blood glucose after eating are a normal physiological response. And “bad” blood glucose responses are those that stay high for a prolonged period; i.e. after elevating, they don’t return to normal within an appropriate period of time.
But now many normoglycemic people are worrying about normal blood glucose responses, due to information that portrays even moderate elevations in blood glucose as harfmul. To add to the confusion, people are looking at standardized cut-off thresholds for diabetes and pre-diabetes, and mistakenly using them to label their own response to eating as measured by a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device.
When it comes to normoglycemic people, there is still a grey area in relation to how much of a glucose spike is a cause for concern. And given that there are still open questions that evidence has not fully answered yet, there is room for different interpretations of how to answer this question.
So what actually is a blood glucose peak that is “too high”? Is it 7.8 mmol/L (140 mg/dL)? 10.0 mmol/L (180 mg/dL)? 11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dL)? Or do we even need to think about this once standard measures (e.g. HbA1C) are normal?
To discuss this interesting area, Dr. Mario Kratz and Dr. Nicola Guess are on the podcast to offer some perspectives and their conclusions from the current evidence base.
Blood Glucose Unit Conversions:
#521: How Does Coffee Impact Our Health?
#520: How Exercise Impacts Appetite, Food Intake and Adiposity – James Dorling, PhD
SNP28: How To Eat for Longevity
#519: Eating Disorders: Inpatient Treatment & Challenges – Helen West, RD
#518: Nutritional Geometry, Philosophy of Science & A Case for Reductionism – Prof. David Raubenheimer & Jonathan Sholl, PhD
#517: Reflecting on Ten Years of Lessons
#516: How to Read Nutrition Studies (Become Confident in Critically Appraising Research)
AMA: Do Low-carbers Need Less Vitmain C? Does Omega-3 Supplementation Actually Benefit Us? & More (SNP 27)
#515: Does Dietary Fat Quality Causally Affect Atherosclerosis Risk? – Jacob Christensen, PhD
#514: Plant-derived Fatty Acids – Ella Baker, PhD
#513: Kidney Stones & Diet – Deepa Kariyawasam, RD
What are Dietary Reference Intakes? Origins, Development & Use (SNP 26)
#512: Alzheimer’s Disease – Drs. Ayesha & Dean Sherzai
#511: Null By Design – When “No Effect” Doesn’t Mean No Effect
#510: Social Comparison: Evidence on its Impacts & What We Can Do – Shannon Beer
AMA: Coconut Oil, Raw Oats, Collagen, & More! (SNP 25)
#509: Helping Clients & Patients Overcome Nutrition Confusion – Jono Steedman, APD
#508: Why Athletes Can Achieve High Performance During an Energy Deficit – Jose Areta, PhD
#507: Does a Higher Portfolio Diet Score Reduce Heart Disease? – Andrea Glenn, PhD
Listener Q&A: Homocysteine, MUFA, Healhty BMI, and more! (Preview)
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Practically Healthy by Dr. Melina
ZOE Science & Nutrition
Intermittent Fasting Stories
Biohacking Superhuman Performance
Nutrition Diva