Dan and James discuss a recent proposal to do away with discussion sections and suggest other stuff they'd like to get rid of from academic publishing.
Links
Everything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
Citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, August 31) "172: In defence of the discussion section", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/N3SFT
Support Everything Hertz
180: Consortium peer reviews
179: Discovery vs. maintenance
178: Alerting researchers about retractions
177: Plagiarism
176: Tracking academic workloads
175: Defending against the scientific dark arts
174: Smug missionaries with test tubes
173: How do science journalists evaluate psychology papers?
171: The easiest person to fool is yourself (with Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris)
170: Holy sheet
169: Using big data to understand behavior (Live episode with Sandra Matz)
168: Meta-meta-science
167: Diluted effect sizes
166: Is science becoming less disruptive over time?
165: Self-promotion
164: The great migration
163: eLife's new peer review model
162: Status bias in peer review
161: The memo (with Brian Nosek)
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Poetry of Science
Behavioral Grooves Podcast
Hidden Brain
Choiceology with Katy Milkman
The Science of Happiness