James proposes proposes a new type of consortium paper that could provide collaborative opportunities for researchers from countries that are underrepresented in published research papers. We also talk about computational reproducibility and paper publication bonuses.
Links
The paper from Steve Lindsay on computational reproducbility: A Plea to Psychology Professional Societies that Publish Journals: Assess Computational Reproducibility
Other links
Everything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
Citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, October 31) "174: Smug missionaries with test tubes", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/FBHRZ
Support Everything Hertz
180: Consortium peer reviews
179: Discovery vs. maintenance
178: Alerting researchers about retractions
177: Plagiarism
176: Tracking academic workloads
175: Defending against the scientific dark arts
173: How do science journalists evaluate psychology papers?
172: In defence of the discussion section
171: The easiest person to fool is yourself (with Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris)
170: Holy sheet
169: Using big data to understand behavior (Live episode with Sandra Matz)
168: Meta-meta-science
167: Diluted effect sizes
166: Is science becoming less disruptive over time?
165: Self-promotion
164: The great migration
163: eLife's new peer review model
162: Status bias in peer review
161: The memo (with Brian Nosek)
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Poetry of Science
Behavioral Grooves Podcast
Hidden Brain
Mysterious Radio: Paranormal, UFO & Lore Interviews
The Science of Happiness