Links:
About This Episode:
Numerous nutrition studies present findings of “no effect,” but interpreting such results requires caution. A null finding, indicating an absence of impact from a nutrient or exposure, may not necessarily suggest a lack of effect overall. Instead, it could stem from issues related to the study’s design, the nature of the exposure, or participant characteristics.
We’ve often referred to such studies as being “null by design”.
These studies, often termed “null by design,” may yield inconclusive results due to insufficient contrast in exposure levels to reveal a significant effect size. Additionally, participants’ baseline nutrient status or intake can contribute to false negatives. For instance, if a study provides a nutrient to individuals already replete in that nutrient, it may lead to an erroneous conclusion. This phenomenon can be understood by considering the bell curve of activity for a nutrient.
Moreover, a lack of methodological rigor can generate ‘false negatives.’ If previous literature indicates associations between high intake of a specific food or nutrient and certain outcomes, a study comparing levels of intake well below that threshold may produce a misleading result.
Some challenges arise from an overly reductionist perspective. In disease processes, reductionism simplifies diseases to a single primary source at the cellular and molecular level. This perspective assumes that if a nutrient shows a relationship with health or disease outcomes at a population level, its biological activity should manifest in isolation. However, applying such assumptions to exposures like diet may not be tenable.
In this discussion, we delve into the concept of “null by design” and present three specific studies with null findings, emphasizing the need for careful interpretation.
#290: Menno Henselmans & Eric Helms, PhD - Diet Breaks, Calorie Cycling & Muscle Retention
#289 Ciaran Fairman, PhD – Exercise Interventions in Cancer Treatment
#288: Ted Ryce: Meditation, Communication & Understanding Behaviours
#287: Gregg Slater - Dietary Fatigue, Nutrition Periodization & the Deficit-Adherence Model
#286: James Morton, PhD - Fuelling Elite Sport: Team Sky, Liverpool FC & Carbohydrate Periodization
#285: What is Health? A Conceptual Framework
#284: Simone Harding – Tackling Negative Body Image & Weight Stigma
#283: Alun Williams, PhD - The Genetics & Science Behind the Historic Caster Semenya/IAAF Case
#282: Louise Burke, PhD - Project Supernova: The Science of Fuelling Elite Athletes
#281: Jake Linardon, PhD – Eating Disorders, Binge Eating & Body Image
#280: Kirsty Elliot-Sale, PhD – Energy Availability, Menstrual Disorders & RED-S
#279: Avrum Bluming, MD & Carol Tavris, PhD – Estrogen, Menopause & Misconceptions About Hormone Replacement
#278: Jackson Peos, PhD – The ICECAP Trial, Intermittent Energy Restriction & the Science of Diet Breaks
#277: Eric Helms, PhD - Non-Quantitative Dieting, Personal Experiments & Optimal Weight Gain for Hypertrophy
#276: Nick Gant, PhD - Neurometabolism: Brain Function, Fatigue & Nutritient Interventions
#275: Kate Solovieva - Psychology, Empathy & Coping Strategies for Better Coaching
#274: James Lindsay, PhD - When Peer-Review Goes Wrong
#273: Bryan Chung, MD, PhD – Dealing with Science Overwhelm & Improving Your Relationship with Research
#272: Barbora de Courten, PhD – Effect of Carnosine on Glucose Metabolism and Chronic Disease Risk
#271: Prof. John Hawley – Circadian Metabolomics & Time-Restricted Feeding
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Good Mood Revolution
Practically Healthy by Dr. Melina
ZOE Science & Nutrition
Intermittent Fasting Stories
Dr. Jockers Functional Nutrition
LONGEVITY with Nathalie Niddam