Benjamin Alarie and Abdi Aidid are legal experts who are heavily involved in the development of legal technology. They are releasing a new book, The Legal Singularity: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Law Radically Better later this year.
Benjamin Alarie is a tax law professor at the University of Toronto and has been in the tax law profession since 2004. He became interested in the future of legal education and how artificial intelligence will affect the profession, which led him to co-found Blue J, a legal technology company in Toronto. On the other hand, Abdi Aidid practiced as a commercial litigator in New York before becoming the Vice President of Legal Research at Blue J. He led the team of lawyers and research analysts and helped develop AI-informed predictive tools, which predict how future courts are likely to rule on new legal situations. Abdi is now a full-time law professor at the University of Toronto, teaching subjects like torts and civil procedure.
Naming the book "The Legal Singularity" is a big claim by the authors, so we asked them to explain what they meant by it. According to Abdi Aidid, the legal singularity is the practical elimination of legal uncertainty and its impact on our institutions and society. It is a future state where the law is unknowable in real time and on demand, and we can start doing things that we were not previously able to do because the law was either difficult to ascertain or we did not have a normative consensus around what the law ought to be. The concept of the legal singularity is related to the idea of a technological singularity, but it is not a totalizing event like the technological singularity. Instead, it is an equally socially important concept that focuses on how technological improvements affect the law and related institutions.
Alarie and Aidid suggest that the legal market needs to address bias in AI tools by keeping humans in the loop in arbitration and judicial contexts for a significant period of time. They believe that even as the legal singularity approaches and people begin to have confidence in algorithmic decision making, humans should still be involved in the process to audit machine-generated decisions. They argue that this is necessary because the law deals with deeply human questions, and there is more at stake than just ones and zeros. They believe that humans have to contribute to the legal system's notions of mercy, fairness, empathy, and procedural justice. They also suggest that involving humans in the process helps to inform the technology before disastrous consequences and helps to refine it. Therefore, they emphasize the need for human review of machine judgments, which will lead to accelerated learning in the law. Furthermore, they highlight that the legal market needs to distinguish between the kinds of problems that are a reflection of unaddressed social problems or those that are new technological problems. They stress that the legal market is still collectively responsible for resolving these issues.
Contact Us:
Twitter: @gebauerm, or @glambert
Voicemail: 713-487-7821
Music: Jerry David DeCicca
Transcript
Tracy LaLonde and The Joychiever Journey
Consumer Arbitration Made Easier with FairShake's Teel Lidow
Spotting Bias and Politicization of Local News Sources - Loyd Auerbach and Dave Boitano
Helping Startups Get Their Start - Dr. Jacqueline Walsh
Stephen Embry - The Future of the Law Office Won't Need Everyone to be in the Office
Douglas Ferguson on Doing the Work in the Meeting
Richard Hsu on Why Law Firms Will Need Lawyers to Return to the Office
Using Data Analytics to Tell Your Story with RStudio's Sarah Lin
The Boston Legal Design Challenge with Jeff Marple, Robert Taylor, and Gabriel Teninbaum
Olga Mack on Valuing Your Skills, Reputation, and Determination
Phil Flora on Leopard Solution’s New Gender and Ethnic Diversity Tool
Using Data to Really Know Your Clients and Predict Their Needs - David Kamien
Williams Lea CEO, Clare Hart on Letting Lawyers Do What They Do Best… Practice Law
Andrea Markstrom and the i.WILL Forum. Women Empowering Women
The Law Firm Antiracism Alliance - Brenna DeVaney
Law Firm Culture and Marketing, and How to Market Law Firm Culture - Barbara Malin and Jennifer Johnson
#Barpocalypse - Cat Moon, Brian L. Frye, Stefanie Mundhenk
Yes, And… A Return to KM 101 - Eugene Cipparone
Text, Context, and SCOTUS' Textualism in Bostock - Andrew Koppelman and Sara Harris
Conversations on Race in the Legal Industry - Bryan Parker and Jonathan Greenblatt
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Commercial Edge: Unleash the Power of People
The emPOWERed Half Hour
NABOR® TALKS
U.S Property Podcast
Aligned Money Show
The Ramsey Show
Planet Money