Complaints on various topics are received by PJLA from any interested party. We must evaluate each to ensure they are valid, then allow CABs (i.e., labs, inspection bodies, etc.) to respond and act as necessary. Some may take the opinion that aggressive approaches should be taken, such as immediate suspension or withdrawal of accreditation, without really understanding what the process is from an accreditation body perspective. This webinar will educate participants on PJLA’s processes for handling complaints including: • Information required when filing a complaint, • the evaluation process by the PJLA investigation team, • timelines for response, • and potential repercussions or actions taken. Presenter Tracy Szerszen, President PJLA
A Look at the Requirements Specified in PJLA Policy on Measurement Traceability PL2
A Look at the Requirements Specified in PJLA Policy on Proficiency Testing Requirements “PL 1”
Navigating Challenges Associated with PCR Technology in a Cannabis Lab
An Update to AOAC International Methods in the Cannabis Industry
An Overview of the CA ELAP Regulations Versus the TNI EL 2016 Standard
Implementing ISO/IEC 17020 Inspection Body Accreditation in the Information Security Industry
17025: The concepts of Measurement Uncertainty Short Course
A Look at ISO/IEC 17025 2017 - Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty & Validity of Results
Cannabis and Hemp Industry Expert Panel
Corrective Action Requirements and Good Practice - ISO/IEC 17025
Common Findings in Assessments - ISO/IEC 17025:2017
Cannabis Potency: An Example of Applying ISO 17025 Principles to a Test Method
Preparing for an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Accreditation Assessment
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Commercial Edge: Unleash the Power of People
The emPOWERed Half Hour
NABOR® TALKS
U.S Property Podcast
Aligned Money Show
The Ramsey Show
Planet Money