In recent years, investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) has been accused of, among other things, bias towards investors, encroaching on state sovereignty, and being too slow and costly.
Gisèle Stephens-Chu, Joaquin P. Terceño, and Alex Wilbrahem examine the criticisms and how ISDS is changing in response, including procedural reforms, plans for a new investment court system and efforts to rebalance rights and obligations between states and investors.
Global investigations #3: defending multiple fronts (part 1)
How will Brexit affect... employees?
How will Brexit affect… contracts?
Investing in startups
Global investigations #2: why do things go wrong?
How will Brexit affect… competition law?
How lawyers can help mitigate cyber risk
Global investigations #1: responding to suspect activity
Tech IPOs – what can we expect in 2019?
The impact of EU regulation on US tech
Cyber security: our experience at the Expo
Cyber security: are you on your best behaviour?
Digital transformation: the secrets of success
Foreign investment review: shifting sands
How to build a digital business
Fuji-Xerox: don’t copy this
The rise of people analytics
Class actions go global
Definitely maybe. Investigating M&A deal certainty
Data and merger control
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Everyday Millionaire
Pure Hustle Podcast
Making Bank
The Ramsey Show
Planet Money