In recent years, investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) has been accused of, among other things, bias towards investors, encroaching on state sovereignty, and being too slow and costly.
Gisèle Stephens-Chu, Joaquin P. Terceño, and Alex Wilbrahem examine the criticisms and how ISDS is changing in response, including procedural reforms, plans for a new investment court system and efforts to rebalance rights and obligations between states and investors.
FS market conduct #4: a look at insider dealing and trading on inside information
Rethinking the supply chain #2: renegotiating long-term contracts
Managing risk in Asia #3: the value of a diverse board
UAE employee monitoring and compliance #2: whistleblowing
Arbitration Insider: Why is climate change and arbitration such a hot topic?
Essential Antitrust Asia #3: Merger control in Vietnam
Essential Antitrust #12: Merger control: are we witnessing a paradigm shift?
Ransomware: what boards need to know about the Colonial Pipeline attack
The EU’s AI Regulation #1: Understanding the draft rules
Essential Foreign Investment #1: CFIUS, China and Europe’s new screening regime
Arbitration top trends: are investment treaties the answer to big tech’s problems?
The rise of ESG disputes against financial institutions: 2021 update
Fintech in focus: is open banking here?
Essential Antitrust #11: Deal disputes: preparing for a more litigious environment
Tax matters: UK Spring Budget 2021
Essential Antitrust #10: Competition law: a bridge or a barrier to sustainability?
UK Financial services enforcement round up and looking ahead
View from the Valley #5: deconstructing SPACs – how they vary and how they perform
Freshfields whistleblowing survey: impact of the #MeToo movement
Managing risk in Asia #2: data, cybersecurity and people
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Commercial Edge: Unleash the Power of People
The emPOWERed Half Hour
U.S Property Podcast
Aligned Money Show
Gorse Culture PODcast : The H.R. Detective Agency!
The Ramsey Show
Planet Money