Your hosts discuss Navarette v. California, which held that an unverified anonymous tip about reckless driving could be sufficient grounds for the police to pull over a car. The case exemplifies how deferential the Supreme Court is to police power, and has resulted in an increased reliance on anonymous tips by the cops, and a corresponding erosion of citizens’ privacy rights.
Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Alexander v. South Carolina NAACP
"The Constitutions Includes Everybody" Live at Harvard Law School
Justice Alito's Red Flags
Arizona v. Navajo Nation
Maryland v. King
The 2024 Mailbag Episode [TEASER]
Free Rhiannon! Campus Protests and the First Amendment
Hans v. Louisiana
Retire, Sonia [TEASER]
Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
The (Constitutional) Crisis at the Border
United States v. Jones
Illinois v. Caballes
Trump v. Anderson
How to Teach Constitutional Law [TEASER]
Nixon v. Fitzgerald
Maryland v. Shatzer
The Federalist Society, part 4: How to Fight Back [TEASER]
The Federalist Society, part 3: The Spoils
The Federalist Society, part 2: The Debate Club
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
City Manager Unfiltered
Potencial Americano
The ASIC Podcast
The Chris Plante Show
Strict Scrutiny