Your hosts discuss Navarette v. California, which held that an unverified anonymous tip about reckless driving could be sufficient grounds for the police to pull over a car. The case exemplifies how deferential the Supreme Court is to police power, and has resulted in an increased reliance on anonymous tips by the cops, and a corresponding erosion of citizens’ privacy rights.
Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
The Federalist Society, part 1: Immodest Origins
The 5-4 Giving Guide 2023
How to Lose Your Job by Supporting Palestine [UNLOCKED]
How to Lose Your Job by Supporting Palestine [TEASER]
Epic Fail! Constitutional Amendments That Didn't Make the Grade [TEASER]
Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Abe Fortas: The Justice Who Walked So Clarence Thomas Could Run [TEASER]
Richardson v. Ramirez
Schenck v. United States
A Note From Rhiannon
Legally Blonde [TEASER]
Palestine Legal: "The Great Difference a Movement Lawyer Can Make"
Geduldig v. Aiello
Berghuis v. Thompkins
The Southern Manifesto [TEASER]
Hampton v. United States
2023-2024 Term Preview with Chris Geidner
Your Questions: Jury Nullification, Law School Reform, and More [TEASER]
United States v. Sioux Nation with Nick Estes
Welcome to Law School 2023
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
City Manager Unfiltered
Potencial Americano
The ASIC Podcast
The Chris Plante Show
Strict Scrutiny