The promise of AI has been around for decades, but it is the last three months that has finally caused an awakening so forceful, that even the legal industry understands it needs to be ready for the upcoming Age of AI. This week's guest has worked toward that goal of integrating AI and other technologies into to practice of law for more than forty years. Johannes (Jan) Scholtes is Chief Data Scientist for iPRO – ZyLAB, and Extraordinairy (Full) Professor Text Mining at Maastricht University in The Netherlands. He joins us this week to discuss the need for lawyers and law firms to use these tools to enhance the power of the practice of law. And he warns that if the traditional legal resources of lawyers and firms won't step up, there are others who will step in to fill that void.
While the AI tools like GPT and other generative AI tools have finally began to be true language tools, there is still a lot that these tools simply cannot do. Scholtes says that there is plenty of legal work to be done, and in fact perhaps more work now that the computers can do most of the heavy lifting and allow the lawyers to do the thinking and strategy.
Scholtes compares the relationship between the lawyer and the technology to be that of a pilot and co-pilot. A relationship in which the co-pilot cannot be completely trusted, but can be trained to assist through the process of vertical training. This means that a law firm needs to work with the AI to have it better understand how to process legal information. Having the technology alongside the lawyers provides a stronger legal representation than just the lawyers or the technology alone. In addition to reducing risk and improving outcomes, Scholtes also projects that Lawyer + AI means higher rates and better profitability, while the clients receive better results.
It is exciting to be at the beginning of this change in the way law is practiced. It is important, however, that law firms, lawyers, and legal professionals understand how to teach and control the technology, and that there needs to be transparency in how the tools work and make decisions. His recommendation is that if all you are offered is and AI Black Box, then you should simply walk away. That lack of trust will come back to bite you.
For more insights from Jan Scholtes, visit his blog, Legal Tech Bridge.
Contact Us:
Twitter: @gebauerm, or @glambert
Voicemail: 713-487-7821
Email: geekinreviewpodcast@gmail.com
Music: Jerry David DeCicca
Transcript available on 3 Geeks
Text, Context, and SCOTUS' Textualism in Bostock - Andrew Koppelman and Sara Harris
Conversations on Race in the Legal Industry - Bryan Parker and Jonathan Greenblatt
The Georgia Copyright Trilogy… The Final Chapter
The Do's and Don't's of Virtual Conferences - Litera's Haley Altman and Alma Asay
Launching the Legal Value Network - Kristina Lambright and Purvi Sanghvi
Why Retention of Legal Talent Can't Be The Equivalent of a Coin Flip - Bryan Parker of Legal Innovators
Heidi Gardner and Brian Stearns: Remote Collaboration from Tools to Psychology
Let's Talk About Our Side Projects
Charlie Uniman - Failure is not the Ugly F-Word Lawyers Think It Is
A Chat About Chatbots and The Law With Katherine Lowry and Diego Alcala
What Should Law Firms Do To Prepare for a Possible COVID-19 Epidemic? With the ALA's April Campbell
The Innovative Concept of Legal Writing in Plain English
Nick Pryor and BCLP³'s Global Innovation Mission
Professor Steve Black on Cybersecurity in the Legal Market
Matt Sunbulli on Fishbowl's Entry into the Legal Industry Social Media Space
The Leadership Journey with Laura Toledo and Kevin Iredell
Ellyssa Valenti Kroski on Law Librarians in the Age of AI, and a Hamilton Escape Room
Professor Ben Barton on Fixing Law Schools
Deep Dive on State Copyright Issues with Kyle Courtney and Ed Walters
The AALL Animal Law Caucus: Acknowledging and Researching Animal Rights in a People-Centric World
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The emPOWERed Half Hour
NABOR® TALKS
U.S Property Podcast
Aligned Money Show
The Ramsey Show
Planet Money