The promise of AI has been around for decades, but it is the last three months that has finally caused an awakening so forceful, that even the legal industry understands it needs to be ready for the upcoming Age of AI. This week's guest has worked toward that goal of integrating AI and other technologies into to practice of law for more than forty years. Johannes (Jan) Scholtes is Chief Data Scientist for iPRO – ZyLAB, and Extraordinairy (Full) Professor Text Mining at Maastricht University in The Netherlands. He joins us this week to discuss the need for lawyers and law firms to use these tools to enhance the power of the practice of law. And he warns that if the traditional legal resources of lawyers and firms won't step up, there are others who will step in to fill that void.
While the AI tools like GPT and other generative AI tools have finally began to be true language tools, there is still a lot that these tools simply cannot do. Scholtes says that there is plenty of legal work to be done, and in fact perhaps more work now that the computers can do most of the heavy lifting and allow the lawyers to do the thinking and strategy.
Scholtes compares the relationship between the lawyer and the technology to be that of a pilot and co-pilot. A relationship in which the co-pilot cannot be completely trusted, but can be trained to assist through the process of vertical training. This means that a law firm needs to work with the AI to have it better understand how to process legal information. Having the technology alongside the lawyers provides a stronger legal representation than just the lawyers or the technology alone. In addition to reducing risk and improving outcomes, Scholtes also projects that Lawyer + AI means higher rates and better profitability, while the clients receive better results.
It is exciting to be at the beginning of this change in the way law is practiced. It is important, however, that law firms, lawyers, and legal professionals understand how to teach and control the technology, and that there needs to be transparency in how the tools work and make decisions. His recommendation is that if all you are offered is and AI Black Box, then you should simply walk away. That lack of trust will come back to bite you.
For more insights from Jan Scholtes, visit his blog, Legal Tech Bridge.
Contact Us:
Twitter: @gebauerm, or @glambert
Voicemail: 713-487-7821
Email: geekinreviewpodcast@gmail.com
Music: Jerry David DeCicca
Transcript available on 3 Geeks
Law and Cultural Psychology with R&G Insights Lab's Dr. Caitlin Handron
Unicourt's Josh Blandi on Improving Access to Federal, State, and Local Court Data
Molly Huie on Bloomberg Law's New DEI Framework
Jennifer Leonard of Penn Law's Future of the Profession Initiative
Nicole Bradick and Ryan McClead on the Launch of Map Engine and Life as a Startup Founder
Pablo Arredondo on CaseText's New WeSearch Tool and How the Neural Net Is Making Its Way Into Legal Information
Bob Taylor, Valerie Dickerson, and Mark Ross on Deloitte Legal Business Services
Dan Packel on the Rise of Distributed Law Firms
Adam Tsao and The Creativity Playbook for Lawyers
Kate Tompkins on Being a Practice Group Leader But Not a Lawyer
What's Next for Jeroen Plink?
Lex Machina's Karl Harris on the Past, Present, and Future of Legal Analytics
Sophia George and Chevazz Brown: Finding Diverse Lawyers via DiversePro
Geoff Zodda on Legal Industry Employment Trends in a Post-COVID World
Rachel Travers on the New Law360 Pulse
Brightflag's Alex Kelly on Using Data and Analytics to Make Better Legal Spend Decisions
AI for Lawyers with Noah Waisberg and Dr. Alexander Hudek
Nicole Morris on Emory Law Schools TI:GER Innovation Conference
How Mid-Level Associates Can Thrive at Law Firms - with Jennifer Bluestein
Jennifer Bluestein on Stepping It Up: A Guide for Mid-Level Law Firm Associates
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The emPOWERed Half Hour
NABOR® TALKS
U.S Property Podcast
Aligned Money Show
The Ramsey Show
Planet Money