When Quaker decided to take Aunt Jemima off the red pancake box after 131 years, did it also try to scrub the legacy she represents? And what sort of compensation is appropriate — and to whom — from a brand that maintained that image in public for so long?
Discussed this week:
“Aunt Jemima Brand to Change Name and Image Over ‘Racial Stereotype’” (Tiffany Hsu, The New York Times, June 2020)“Aunt Jemima: I’se in Town, Honey” (Jim Crow Museum of Racist Memorabilia at Ferris State University)“The Dixie Chicks Change Their Name, Dropping the ‘Dixie’” (Ben Sisario, The New York Times, June 2020)“Lady Antebellum Sues the Singer Lady A Over Name Change” (Joe Coscarelli, The New York Times, July 2020)“Aunt Jemima’s Heirs’ $3 Billion Lawsuit Against Pepsi, Quaker Oats Tossed by Judge” (Tim Kenneally, The Wrap, February 2015)“What Is Owed” (Nikole Hannah Jones, The New York Times, June 2020)“The Case for Reparations” (Ta-Nehisi Coates, The Atlantic, June 2014)We Wouldn't Leave Kanye, But Should We?
We're Here For Your Anger, Jessica Walter
We’re Queer - and Apparently So Is Everybody Else
We Unpack Black Male Privilege
We Watch Whiteness
We Talk BeyChella
We Get It On (With Ourselves)
We Celebrate the REAL MLK Day
We’re Maxed Out, You’re Maxed Out, Everybody Is Maxed Out
We Love Aunties
We Don’t Love Everything Made By Black People and That’s OK?
We Paint the Town Obama
We Want To Know What Love Is
We Take the 15:17 All the Way to Pyeongchang
We Sink Our Claws Into "Black Panther" with Ta-Nehisi Coates
We'll See You Tomorrow
We Don't Know Where We Are
We're Still Here For Janet
We Have a Right To Be Mad
We Have a Theory About Oprah
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Modern West
The Daily
Modern Love
The Ezra Klein Show
Dear Sugars
1619