Two recent major podcast themes - section 3 of the fourteenth amendment, and judicial ethics - echoed through the news this past week. Wisconsin legislators seek to impeach a new state Supreme Court Justice before she even sits for a case; and in Washington, Justice Alito is asked to recuse himself because of an interview he gave. Meanwhile, Section 3 is addressed by a former US Attorney General, who says it is inapplicable to the President for reasons that may seem counterintuitive, even strange. We analyze the claims as well as what lies behind them in our constitutional system. CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com.
Section Three Punditry: The Good, The Bad, and The Silly
The World Turns to Section Three
Juries, Jarkesy, and a Joke
2 Experts, 3 Courts, Section 3, Part 3 - Special Guests William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen
Sandra the First
Sense and Nonsensibility on Section 3 - Special Guests Mark Graber and Gerard Magliocca
Guns, Clips, and Rahimi
Moore on the Brief - Special Guest Vikram David Amar
Moore, in Brief
Aisles, not Walls
Speakerless
A Tale of Two Jordans
Allen and Affirmative Action, Again
Eleven Presidents - Special Guest Bob Woodward
Have Kavanaugh, Will Travel
Justice Jackson’s Santa Clause
The Two Experts, Part Two - Special Guests William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen
The Two Experts on Section Three - Special Guests William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen
Georgia On Our Minds - Special Guest Ruth Marcus
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free