Two recent major podcast themes - section 3 of the fourteenth amendment, and judicial ethics - echoed through the news this past week. Wisconsin legislators seek to impeach a new state Supreme Court Justice before she even sits for a case; and in Washington, Justice Alito is asked to recuse himself because of an interview he gave. Meanwhile, Section 3 is addressed by a former US Attorney General, who says it is inapplicable to the President for reasons that may seem counterintuitive, even strange. We analyze the claims as well as what lies behind them in our constitutional system. CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com.
Much to Bragg About?
It’s Coming
The Lord Mayor Adams
Sing a Song (of) Mike Pence
Torture, Time Travel, and Transformation
Secrets, Boards, and Moots - Oh My!
Treason, Reason, History, and OurStory - Special Guest Kermit Roosevelt III
Trillion Dollar Tricks - Special Guest Jack Balkin
Declaration, or Gettysburg? - Special Guest Kermit Roosevelt III
Wait - Don’t Tell Me!
The Idaho Murder Case in Constitutional Perspective
Speaker-ish
January 6th, Santos, and The Speaker
Strictly Scrutinizing Moore - Special Guest Kate Shaw
More on Moore - The Oral Argument, Continued
Mr. Amar Goes to Washington - the Moore v. Harper Oral Argument
Out-Ranked: Live Podcast with Yale Law School’s FedSoc Chapter
Ban the Box?
100 Podcasts for Us, 40 Years for FedSoc - Special Guest Steven G. Calabresi
Double Negative Action
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free