Two recent major podcast themes - section 3 of the fourteenth amendment, and judicial ethics - echoed through the news this past week. Wisconsin legislators seek to impeach a new state Supreme Court Justice before she even sits for a case; and in Washington, Justice Alito is asked to recuse himself because of an interview he gave. Meanwhile, Section 3 is addressed by a former US Attorney General, who says it is inapplicable to the President for reasons that may seem counterintuitive, even strange. We analyze the claims as well as what lies behind them in our constitutional system. CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com.
This Must Be The Place
Third Time’s A Charm
The Legacy of the Harvard Case - Special Guest Jeffrey Brenzel
Amara Culpa, Amara Bene
Scrutinizing Affirmative Action - Special Guest Jeffrey Brenzel
The Rights of Bigots
No Moore ISL
Four Clauses, Two Juries
Whose Welfare?
The Judgment of History
I Am Calabresi
Crossfire on the Ceiling - Special Guests Jack Balkin and Saikrishna Prakash
Duct Tape on a Warhol - Special Guest James Boyle
Judging for Yourself - Special Guest Kathleen Clark
Coronation Considerations
More or Less Moore
Standing Rules
Judges and Adverse Events
Doubting Thomas, and doubting the doubters
Discretion and Indictment
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free