As promised, we return in very short order with the completion of our analysis and response to the oral argument in Trump v. Anderson - before the Court has ruled. Again, key clips from the argument are played and dissected. The previous Part I episode concentrated on arguments concerning self-execution of Section Three; this episode reviews many of the other issues addressed by the Court, from questions of the nature of the Presidential Election and the closely related Electoral College, to the persistent irritant of "officer" and "office" questions. As in the prior episode, Professor Amar “slows everything down” to allow you and hopefully the Court avoid sweet-sounding but flawed paths. This episode is posted 8 days early for this reason. Continuing legal education credit is available; visit podcast.njsba.com after listening.
This Must Be The Place
Third Time’s A Charm
The Legacy of the Harvard Case - Special Guest Jeffrey Brenzel
Amara Culpa, Amara Bene
Scrutinizing Affirmative Action - Special Guest Jeffrey Brenzel
The Rights of Bigots
No Moore ISL
Four Clauses, Two Juries
Whose Welfare?
The Judgment of History
I Am Calabresi
Crossfire on the Ceiling - Special Guests Jack Balkin and Saikrishna Prakash
Duct Tape on a Warhol - Special Guest James Boyle
Judging for Yourself - Special Guest Kathleen Clark
Coronation Considerations
More or Less Moore
Standing Rules
Judges and Adverse Events
Doubting Thomas, and doubting the doubters
Discretion and Indictment
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free