As promised, we return in very short order with the completion of our analysis and response to the oral argument in Trump v. Anderson - before the Court has ruled. Again, key clips from the argument are played and dissected. The previous Part I episode concentrated on arguments concerning self-execution of Section Three; this episode reviews many of the other issues addressed by the Court, from questions of the nature of the Presidential Election and the closely related Electoral College, to the persistent irritant of "officer" and "office" questions. As in the prior episode, Professor Amar “slows everything down” to allow you and hopefully the Court avoid sweet-sounding but flawed paths. This episode is posted 8 days early for this reason. Continuing legal education credit is available; visit podcast.njsba.com after listening.
The Federalist Society, in Brief - Special Guest Steven Calabresi
The News in Brief
The Brief in Brief
Sweet Hugo in Alabama - A Special Live Podcast
Zelig On The Court - Special Guest Brad Snyder
Zelig of the Court - Special Guest Brad Snyder
The Court’s Other Amy
Loving Lincoln, and Castigating Kastigar
Masters, Monarchs, and Mangling the Fifth
Trump Says His Name
Trump Takes the Fifth
Afraid to Ask: Hamilton and a Wealth Tax
Search-A-Lago
Originalism on Trial
Time is Now
Tackling Kennedy
Separate or Equal
The Long and The Short of Bruen
Unprecedented
Special Episode - Prediction and Prescription
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free