The Fundraising Talent Podcast
Business:Non-Profit
I spent most of my career believing that the myriad of arms-length tactics that consume most fundraising plans (GivingTuesday, direct response, special events, etc. ) were the problem. Then I encountered a simple insight. One of the earliest scholars in the fundraising community, Paul Schervish, explained that it was important to distinguish between those efforts that lead people to become givers in the first place and those that lead some donors to make larger than average gifts or to increase their giving. The inability to make sense of such a distinction was the problem I didn’t see early in my career. Following Schervish’s logic, we encourage our clients to make sense of those efforts that most effectively yield their initial gifts and those that ensure the subsequent gift.
What was especially encouraging about today’s podcast conversation was learning that Julia is encouraging her clients to make a very similar distinction. Julia encourages her clients to make sense of the difference between what is an outcome of marketing versus what should be expected of fundraising. Julia explains that marketing strategies can be counted on to get people’s attention and generate the initial gift, while we should rely on fundraising strategies to ensure the cultivation of meaningful relationships and the subsequent gifts that accompany them. For those who haven’t made this distinction, Julia wants them to ask themselves why they would communicate with individuals they don’t know the same way they would those with whom they have a relationship. She also warns that appealing to everyone the same way is effectively not appealing to anyone.
As always, we are especially grateful to our friends at CueBack for sponsoring The Fundraising Talent Podcast. If you’d like to learn more about hosting the Responsive Fundraising roadshow in your local community, email me. And, if you’d like to download Responsive’s latest edition of Carefully & Critically, just click here.
#126 | Was marketing a mistake for fundraising?
#125 | Is donor-centered fundraising really what our donors are looking for?
#124 | Will employers continue to pay top salaries for those with the wrong mindset?
#123 | Should fundraising professionals be afraid of donor-advised funds?
#122 | Are nonprofits effectively leveraging their teams to increase fundraising capacity?
#121 | Where should the most experienced fundraising professionals spend their time?
#120 | Are nonprofits ready for the rising generation of intentional fundraisers?
#119 | Is fundraising heading for a perfect storm?
#118 | Has fundraising professionalized an inferiority complex?
#117 | Are fundraisers ready to think more critically about their work? Pt. 2
#116 | Are fundraisers ready to think more critically about their work?
#115 | How do I convince our board to invest in our fundraising capacity?
#114 | How do we curb fundraising's appetite for technology-based solutions?
#113 | What are the insider secrets to an awesome fundraising career?
#112 | Why are nonprofit organizations so resistant to change?
#111 | In 2020, what three big ideas should fundraising professionals be thinking about?
#110 | How can prevent fundraising from being an emotional roller coaster?
#109 | Are you ready to meet the expectations of today’s Social Fundraisers?
#108 | Are nonprofits reminiscing about the past rather than focusing on the future?
#107 | Do nonprofit leaders know when the time is right for retirement?
Join Podbean Ads Marketplace and connect with engaged listeners.
Advertise Today
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The emPOWERed Half Hour
Social Dallas Podcast
Change Church Podcast
Six Degrees with Kevin Bacon
Nonprofits Are Messy: Lessons in Leadership | Fundraising | Board Development | Communications
Nonprofit Mastermind Podcast