Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett
Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
#111 - Should We Raise The Federal Gas Tax To Fund Infrastructure?
Bonus Podcast: Is Death Final?
#110 - Are China And The U.S. Long-Term Enemies?
#109 - Should Courts Or Campuses Decide Sexual Assault Cases?
Bonus Podcast: Should We Abolish the Minimum Wage?
#108 - Does The U.S. Need To Defeat ISIS, Or Is Containment Enough?
Bonus Podcast: Israel Can Live With A Nuclear Iran
Bonus Podcast: Obamacare Is Now Beyond Rescue
Bonus Podcast: Men Are Finished
#107 - Should States Be Required To License Same-Sex Marriages?
#106 - Is Obama's Iran Deal Good For America?
Bonus Podcast: Too Many Kids Go To College
#105 - Is Smart Technology Making Us Dumb?
#104 - Should We Abolish the Death Penalty?
#103 - Has The President Exceeded His Authority By Waging War Without Congress?
#102 - Should The U.S. Adopt The Right To Be Forgotten Online?
#101 - Are Liberals Stifling Intellectual Diversity?
#100 - Should The World Bet On America?
Tribute To David Carr
#99 - Is Amazon The Reader's Friend?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Teachers Talk Radio
LifeBlood
Navigating Life After 40
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast