Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett
Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
#129 - Should States Call a Convention to Amend the Constitution?
#128 - Is Obama's Foreign Policy a Failure?
#127 - Has Gerrymandering Destroyed the Political Center?
#126 - Should We Give Undocumented Immigrants a Path to Citizenship?
#125 - Is "Big Pharma" to Blame for Rising Health Care Costs?
#124 - Are the Elites to Blame for the Trump Phenomenon?
#123 - Climate Change: Has the EPA Gone Overboard?
Bonus Podcast: The GOP Must Seize The Center Or Die
Bonus Podcast: The Supreme Court Considers Racial Preferences In State University Admissions
#122 - Has The President Usurped The Constitutional Power Of Congress?
#121 - Do Hunters Conserve Wildlife?
#120 - Eliminate Corporate Subsidies
#119 - Should We Trust The Promise Of Artificial Intelligence?
#118 - Is Free Speech Threatened On Campus?
#117 - Are Lifespans Long Enough?
#116 - Should The U.S. Let In 100,000 Syrian Refugees?
#115 - Does The Equal Protection Clause Forbid Racial Preferences In State University Admissions?
#114 - Can Central Banks Print Prosperity?
#113 - Do U.S. Prosecutors Have Too Much Power?
#112 - Should College Students Be Allowed To Take Smart Drugs?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Teachers Talk Radio
LifeBlood
Navigating Life After 40
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast