Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett
Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
#160 - Ten Years After the Global Financial Crisis, Is the System Safer?
Season Preview: New Year, New Debates
#83 - Should We Avoid Eating Anything With A Face?
#105 - Is Smart Technology Making Us Dumb?
#159 - Has Silicon Valley Lost Its Soul?
An IQ2US Thanksgiving Tradition
#158 - Is Trump Bad for Comedy?
#157 - Will Progressive Populism Save The Democratic Party?
#156 - Will Retail Alliances Fix the U.S. Health Care System?
#155 - Unresolved: U.S. National Security
Join IQ2US Live in New York
#154 - Has Globalization Undermined the American Working Class?
#153 - Is Social Media Good For Democracy?
#152 - Trigger Warning: Are Safe Spaces Dangerous?
#151 - Will Automation Crash Democracy?
#150 - Can Negotiations Denuclearize North Korea?
#149 - Is Bitcoin More Than A Bubble?
#148 - Should Net Neutrality Be Saved?
#147 - As We Evolve, Do We Need God Less?
#146 - Does Humanitarian Intervention Do More Harm Than Good?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Teachers Talk Radio
LifeBlood
Navigating Life After 40
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast