Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett
Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
#180 - Was the Global Financial System Better Prepared for the Pandemic Than 2008?
#179 - Is the Defense Production Act Being Underutilized?
How to Fight an Infodemic
#178 - Does Maximum Pressure Against Iran Work?
#177 - Is Anti-Zionism the New Anti-Semitism?
#176 - Is the Two-Party System Good for Democracy?
#175 - Is it Time to Expand Nuclear Power?
Ezra Klein on Why We're Polarized
Bonus Episode: Can Progressives Save Capitalism?
#97 - Should We Legalize Assisted Suicide?
Bonus Episode: How Do We Make Our Debates Happen?
#174 - Is Capitalism a Blessing?
#173 - Is Parenting Overrated?
#172 - Has Europe Declared War on American Tech Companies?
#115 - Is Affirmative Action in College Admissions Constitutional?
#171 - Should We Replace Private Insurance With Medicare For All?
#170 - Unresolved: Shifting Power in the Middle East
Bonus Episode: Are We In a New Authoritarian Era?
Chris Anderson on Ideas & Inspiration
#169 - Is U.S. Policy Toward China Productive?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Navigating Life After 40
Teaching Learning Leading K-12
Regenerative Skills
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast