We discuss two recent plagiarism cases, one you've probably heard about and another that you probably haven't heard about if you're outside Norway. We also chat about the parallels between plagiarism and sports doping—would people reconsider academic dishonesty if they were reminded that future technology may catch them out?
Here are some of the takeaways from the episode (generated with the help of AI):
Other links
Everything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
Citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, January 31) "177: Plagiarism", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/4M3F2
Support Everything Hertz
100: Hundredth episode live special (with Daniel Lakens, Amy Orben, and Chris Chambers)
99: Science advocacy
98: Episode titles are redundant, at best (with Sophia Crüwell)
97: Slow science
96: The chaotic state of doctoral research
95: All good presentations are alike; each bad presentation is bad in its own way
94: Predicting the replicability of research
93: Double-blind peer review vs. open science
92: Chaos in the brickyard
91: Shifting the goalposts in statistics (with Kristin Sainani)
90: Mo data mo problems
89: Conflicts of interest in psychology (with Tom Chivers)
88: The pomodoro episode
87: Improving the scientific poster (with Mike Morrison)
86: Should I stay or should I go?
85: GWAS big teeth you have, grandmother (with Kevin Mitchell)
84: A GPS in the Garden of Forking Paths (with Amy Orben)
83: Back to our dirty unwashed roots
82: More janitors and fewer architects
81: Too Young To Know, Too Old To Care
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Poetry of Science
Behavioral Grooves Podcast
Hidden Brain
Choiceology with Katy Milkman
The Science of Happiness