We discuss two recent plagiarism cases, one you've probably heard about and another that you probably haven't heard about if you're outside Norway. We also chat about the parallels between plagiarism and sports doping—would people reconsider academic dishonesty if they were reminded that future technology may catch them out?
Here are some of the takeaways from the episode (generated with the help of AI):
Other links
Everything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
Citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, January 31) "177: Plagiarism", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/4M3F2
Support Everything Hertz
80: Cites are not endorsements (with Sean Rife)
79: Clinical trial reporting (with Henry Drysdale)
78: Large-scale collaborative science (with Lisa DeBruine)
77: Promiscuous expertise
76: Open peer review
75: Overlay journals (with Daniele Marinazzo)
74: Seeing double (with Elisabeth Bik)
73: Update your damn syllabus
72: Anonymity in scientific publishing
71: Moving for your job
70: Doubling-blinding dog balls
69: Open science tools (with Brian Nosek)
68: Friends don’t let friends believe in impact factors (with Nathan Hall)
67: Shit Academics Say (with Nathan Hall)
66: Ideal worlds vs grim truths
65: Blockchain and open science (with Jon Brock)
64: Salami slicing
63: Science journalism (with Brian Resnick)
62: Adopting open science practices (with Dorothy Bishop)
61: Performance enhancing thugs (with Greg Nuckols)
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Poetry of Science
Behavioral Grooves Podcast
Hidden Brain
The Science of Happiness
Choiceology with Katy Milkman