We discuss two recent plagiarism cases, one you've probably heard about and another that you probably haven't heard about if you're outside Norway. We also chat about the parallels between plagiarism and sports doping—would people reconsider academic dishonesty if they were reminded that future technology may catch them out?
Here are some of the takeaways from the episode (generated with the help of AI):
Other links
Everything Hertz on social media
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
Citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, January 31) "177: Plagiarism", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/4M3F2
Support Everything Hertz
20: Sample sizes in psychology studies
19: Let us spray: oxytocin and spirituality
18: Data sharing
17: Journals: Do we need them?
16: What makes a good psych study?
15: Software and coding
14: Science communication
13: Academic horror stories
12: Reporting heart rate variability studies
11: The placebo effect
10: Failure
9: What happens if your research is wrong?
8: The PhD to Postdoc transition
Episode 7: 7: The writing process
6: The research pipeline - getting from idea to publication
5: Do you even replicate?
4: Meta-analysis or mega-silliness?
3: Scientific publishing
2: Nutrition and Psychiatry
1: So you want to measure heart rate variability...
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Poetry of Science
Behavioral Grooves Podcast
Hidden Brain
Choiceology with Katy Milkman
The Science of Happiness