Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett
Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Helen Fisher on How Genes Affect Your Politics
Intelligence Squared Year-Ender
Essential Workers or Elderly? Larry Brilliant on the Vaccine Debate
Agree to Disagree: Are Identity Politics a Way to Win?
#187 - Should We Stop Worrying About National Deficits?
Agree to Disagree: Are Election Lawsuits Good For Democracy?
#186 - Is a U.S.-China Space Race Good for Humanity?
Election Special: A Historian and Futurist Debate 2020
Discourse Disruptors: A Divided Nation – One Perspective
A Supreme Special Episode: Amy Coney Barrett & The State of SCOTUS
#185 - Is It Time to Redistribute the Wealth?
#184 - Unresolved: American Policing
#154 - Has Globalization Undermined the American Working Class?
Newt Minow on the Presidential Debates
Agree to Disagree: Should Washington Break Up Big Tech?
Agree to Disagree: Broadband for All?
#183 - Is Nationalism a Force for Good?
#164 - Should Social Media Companies Honor the First Amendment?
#182 - Will Coronavirus Reshape the World Order in China's Favor?
#181 - Has The Electoral College Outlived Its Usefulness?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Navigating Life After 40
Teaching Learning Leading K-12
Regenerative Skills
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast