Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett
Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Will ChatGPT Do More Harm Than Good?
Has China's Power Peaked?
Does the Sex Offender Registry Do More Harm Than Good?
Is Parenting Overrated?
Is Elon Musk Killing Twitter?
Has Globalization Backfired?
Was January 6th an Existential Threat to American Democracy?
Changing Your Mind, with Adam Grant, Ray Dalio, and Bo Seo
Bonus: Year in Review
Is Capitalism A Blessing?
Does America Need A Digital Dollar?
Is Affirmative Action Unfair to Asian Americans?
Should We Eat More Processed Foods?
Is Public Radio Still Relevant?
Unresolved: Information Disorder
Is Taiwan Indefensible?
Are Primary Elections Ruining Democracy?
Is It Time to End Qualified Immunity for Cops?
Do Unions Work For The Economy?
Should Paying Hacker Ransoms Be Illegal?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Navigating Life After 40
Teaching Learning Leading K-12
Regenerative Skills
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast