Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett
Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
It's Time to Expand Nuclear Power
Thinking Again with Adam Grant: The Power of Debate, and Knowing What You Don’t Know
#200 - Are Big Cities Past Their Prime?
Agree to Disagree: Is It Time to End the Covid Emergency?
Agree to Disagree: Ukraine
#199 - Should We Use Gene Editing to Make Better Babies?
Agree to Disagree: Is True Love a Myth?
#198 - Is America Retreating from Global Leadership?
IQ2 Conversation: A New University Offers "Forbidden" Courses
The Pandemic: Year-In-Review
#197 - Is Amazon Good for Small Business?
Agree to Disagree: Meritocracy
#196 - Is Cancel Culture Toxic?
Agree to Disagree: Booster Shots
Agree to Disagree: Cyber War and Hacker Ransoms
#195 - Should We Expand the Supreme Court?
#194 - Is the United Nations Obsolete?
Agree to Disagree: Build Back Better
Agree to Disagree COVID Series: Vaccine Mandates (Updated)
Agree to Disagree: Leaving Afghanistan
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Navigating Life After 40
Teaching Learning Leading K-12
Regenerative Skills
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast