Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett
Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Should We Use Gene Editing to Make Better Babies?
Should We Separate the Art From the Artist?
Is Amazon Good for Small Business?
Long Live The British Monarchy?
Should We Search for Extraterrestrial Life?
Will AI Do More Harm Than Good?
Should The SAT Be Erased?
Is Cancel Culture Toxic?
Should Trump Be Indicted?
Should We Eat More Processed Foods?
Should We Forgive Student Debt?
Should We Isolate Russia?
Agree to Disagree: Can the Fed Manage a Soft Landing?
We Should Expand the Supreme Court
Humans Can Adapt to Climate Change
Debate Like a World Champion: A Conversation with Bo Seo, Harvard Debate Coach & Global Debate Champion
Should Society Legalize Psychedelics?
Agree to Disagree: Does Your Electric Vehicle Help The Planet?
Agree to Disagree: Can Small Investors Beat The Street?
Agree to Disagree: Is It Right to End Roe?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Navigating Life After 40
Teaching Learning Leading K-12
Regenerative Skills
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast