What should we think when an academic Humanities journal unsuspectingly publishes a paper that's been written as a hoax, full of fashionable jargon and deliberately specious arguments? Does this demonstrate that the Humanities set a higher value on shallow intellectual trends than on rigorous scholarship - or is there something more nuanced and complicated going on?
Philosophy in the wake of Empire pt. 2: Migrants and other Others
Philosophy in the wake of Empire pt. 1: The white way to think
In the wild
The inside of anger
Phenomenology
Anti-social media
Science, misinformation and dissent
Refugees and moral obligation
Philosophy in a nutshell pt 6: Becoming a woman
Philosophy in a nutshell pt 5: Ubuntu
Philosophy in a nutshell pt 4: Nietzsche and nihilism
Philosophy in a nutshell pt 3: Derrida and the text
Philosophy in a nutshell pt 2: Confucius, wealth and politics
Philosophy in a nutshell pt 1: The aphorism
Politics at the extremes
PRESENTS — Ideas
Progressive Islam
The abominable heretic
Shifting the frame on COVID-19
Lev Shestov: staying awake in the dark
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
강유원의 책담화冊談話
The Art of Manliness
Dear Hank & John
Cult of Conspiracy
Conversations With Coleman