What should we think when an academic Humanities journal unsuspectingly publishes a paper that's been written as a hoax, full of fashionable jargon and deliberately specious arguments? Does this demonstrate that the Humanities set a higher value on shallow intellectual trends than on rigorous scholarship - or is there something more nuanced and complicated going on?
The great and the good-enough
Pop, philosophy and politics
Edmund Burke, revolution and reform
Hegel, nature and the Anthropocene
The phenomenology of love
Conspiracy theories, anti-Semitism and fun
Adoption and moral obligation
Identity politics
Beauty: aesthetic or moral ideal?
Rupture and hope
Sex, death and chilli sauce
Philosophy and myth
The predicament of existence
Moral beauty and art
Philosophers in love
The ethics of uterus transplantation
Extremism
Trans-national adoption and "blending in"
Efficiency, productivity, excess
Consciousness and contemplation
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Modern West
강유원의 책담화冊談話
The Art of Manliness
The Gray Area with Sean Illing
Dear Hank & John
Overthink