What should we think when an academic Humanities journal unsuspectingly publishes a paper that's been written as a hoax, full of fashionable jargon and deliberately specious arguments? Does this demonstrate that the Humanities set a higher value on shallow intellectual trends than on rigorous scholarship - or is there something more nuanced and complicated going on?
The trouble with our moral evolution
RN Presents: This Much Is True
About time, part 4: The insect clock
About time, part 3: Time and perception
About time, part 2: Time in fiction
About time, part 1: Newton's exploding clock
The abominable heretic
How should we treat insects?
Was the market economy inevitable?
Structural injustice and individual responsibility
Women, the alt-right and the liberal centre
Nietzsche and transfiguration
Trust, risk and experts
Mathematical objects
Misogyny
Analytic philosophy: the leading brand
The death of analytic philosophy?
Marxism pt 2: Black Marxism
Marxism pt 1: Marx the philosopher
Ethics, philosophy and immigration
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
강유원의 책담화冊談話
The Art of Manliness
Dear Hank & John
Cult of Conspiracy
Alan Watts Being in the Way