What should we think when an academic Humanities journal unsuspectingly publishes a paper that's been written as a hoax, full of fashionable jargon and deliberately specious arguments? Does this demonstrate that the Humanities set a higher value on shallow intellectual trends than on rigorous scholarship - or is there something more nuanced and complicated going on?
Owning the public square
Philosophy behind bars
Causation and death
The prophetic vision of Günther Anders
How should we treat insects?
Philosophy and travel
Refugees and moral obligation
How Nietzsche extracts cheerfulness from suffering
Trust and scepticism in a post-truth world
Satanism
Housing part 3 - land rights
Housing part 2 - rent
Housing pt 1 - care ethics
Values and goals
What's new in death - part 2
What's new in death - part 1
Doctors and dualism
Art and hate speech
Simone de Beauvoir: becoming a woman
Ubuntu
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
강유원의 책담화冊談話
The Art of Manliness
Dear Hank & John
Cult of Conspiracy
Alan Watts Being in the Way