What should we think when an academic Humanities journal unsuspectingly publishes a paper that's been written as a hoax, full of fashionable jargon and deliberately specious arguments? Does this demonstrate that the Humanities set a higher value on shallow intellectual trends than on rigorous scholarship - or is there something more nuanced and complicated going on?
Women philosophers in 19th century Germany
Police abolition
Neofeudalism: techno-lords and peasants
Friendship
Gaslighting
Why time doesn't pass
Exploring Tourette's
Philosophy and myth
Transgender identity and experience
How philosophy fell in love with language
Philosophy for tough times
Taking politics seriously
Gender, gaming and pop culture
Exploring the multiverse
Leadership
Bilingual parenting, home and the mother tongue
Philosophy behind bars
Trans-national adoption and "blending in"
Richard Rorty and America
The anti-philosophers
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
강유원의 책담화冊談話
The Art of Manliness
Dear Hank & John
Cult of Conspiracy
Alan Watts Being in the Way