What should we think when an academic Humanities journal unsuspectingly publishes a paper that's been written as a hoax, full of fashionable jargon and deliberately specious arguments? Does this demonstrate that the Humanities set a higher value on shallow intellectual trends than on rigorous scholarship - or is there something more nuanced and complicated going on?
What can David Hume teach us?
Chronomobilities
Logic in Indian philosophy
Ecocultural identity
Philosophy and ecology
Restlessness
Neurophenomenology and embodied sensemaking
The problem with "moral machines"
Honour in the institution
Identity politics
Living like a Stoic
What we talk about when we talk about race
Cultural appropriation
Civilisation and the salon
Derrida and difficulty
Free will, retribution and just deserts
Philosophy in the wake of Empire part 5: Tracks of thought
Philosophy in the wake of Empire part 4: Africa
Philosophy in the wake of Empire pt. 3: Missionary feminism
Philosophy in the wake of Empire pt. 2: Migrants and other Others
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Modern West
강유원의 책담화冊談話
The Art of Manliness
The Gray Area with Sean Illing
Dear Hank & John
Overthink