What should we think when an academic Humanities journal unsuspectingly publishes a paper that's been written as a hoax, full of fashionable jargon and deliberately specious arguments? Does this demonstrate that the Humanities set a higher value on shallow intellectual trends than on rigorous scholarship - or is there something more nuanced and complicated going on?
Consciousness and contemplation
Art and climate
China, Confucius and the courtyard
Stuff
What we talk about when we talk about race
The death of analytic philosophy?
Restlessness
Structural injustice and individual responsibility
Derrida and difficulty
The many worlds of David Lewis
Mathematics and the good life
Bad thinking and good people
The individual and the collective
Philosophy and psychedelic experience
Buddhist logic
Care ethics
Philosophy and children
Gender and gaming
What is dignity?
Yan Fu: China meets Western liberalism
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
강유원의 책담화冊談話
The Art of Manliness
Dear Hank & John
Cult of Conspiracy
Conversations With Coleman