What should we think when an academic Humanities journal unsuspectingly publishes a paper that's been written as a hoax, full of fashionable jargon and deliberately specious arguments? Does this demonstrate that the Humanities set a higher value on shallow intellectual trends than on rigorous scholarship - or is there something more nuanced and complicated going on?
De-extinction, pt 2
De-extinction, pt 1
Art and hate speech
Women and the canon
Data privacy and informed consent
Women philosophers in antiquity
Moral creativity
Tradition, modernity and crisis in Ukraine
The lessons of failure
A Buddhist perspective on the ethics of violence
On being a minority in philosophy
Skilled performance and cognition
China, Confucius and the courtyard
Values and goals
Pop, philosophy and politics
Conspiracy theories, anti-Semitism and fun
Efficiency, productivity and excess
Philosophy and children
Power, domination and the ethics of global philanthropy
Bilingual parenting, home and the mother tongue
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
강유원의 책담화冊談話
The Art of Manliness
Dear Hank & John
Cult of Conspiracy
Conversations With Coleman